282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23792602)
1. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.
Guo L; Liu X; Wang L; Sun H; Huang K; Li X; Tang F; Li S; Yuan X; Wang C
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):910-8. PubMed ID: 25867278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stage Ib, IIa, and IIb cervix cancer, postsurgical staging, and prognosis.
Matsuyama T; Inoue I; Tsukamoto N; Kashimura M; Kamura T; Saito T; Uchino H
Cancer; 1984 Dec; 54(12):3072-7. PubMed ID: 6498784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do FIGO stage IA and small (≤2 cm) IB1 cervical adenocarcinomas have a good prognosis and warrant less radical surgery?
Al-Kalbani M; McVeigh G; Nagar H; McCluggage WG
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 22080884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Significance of the absolute number and ratio of metastatic lymph nodes in predicting postoperative survival for the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA2 to IIA cervical cancer.
Chen Y; Zhang L; Tian J; Fu X; Ren X; Hao Q
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jan; 23(1):157-63. PubMed ID: 23221732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Matched-case comparison for the role of surgery in FIGO stage Ib1-IIa squamous cell carcinoma of cervix and suspicious para-aortic lymph node metastasis.
Kim HS; Park NH; Wu HG; Cho JY; Chung HH; Kim JW; Song YS; Kim SH; Kang SB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 16(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 18979134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cervical Cancer: 2018 Revised International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Staging System and the Role of Imaging.
Saleh M; Virarkar M; Javadi S; Elsherif SB; de Castro Faria S; Bhosale P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 May; 214(5):1182-1195. PubMed ID: 32182097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic value of pretreatment 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with cervical cancer treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.
Onal C; Reyhan M; Parlak C; Guler OC; Oymak E
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1104-10. PubMed ID: 23792605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. International Federation of gynecology and obstetrics staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum: estimation of survival in patients with node-positive epithelial ovarian cancer.
Pereira A; Pérez-Medina T; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM; Rodríguez-Tapia A; Peregrin I; Mendizabal E; Ortiz-Quintana L
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jan; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 25405578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastases in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma: a prospective study.
Choi HJ; Roh JW; Seo SS; Lee S; Kim JY; Kim SK; Kang KW; Lee JS; Jeong JY; Park SY
Cancer; 2006 Feb; 106(4):914-22. PubMed ID: 16411226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. NR2F6 Expression Correlates with Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis and Poor Prognosis in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Niu C; Sun X; Zhang W; Li H; Xu L; Li J; Xu B; Zhang Y
Int J Mol Sci; 2016 Oct; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 27775588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver variability of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging in cervical cancer.
Tummers P; Gerestein K; Mens JW; Verstraelen H; van Doorn H
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jun; 23(5):890-4. PubMed ID: 23640293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Primary uterine cervical cancer: correlation of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and clinical staging (FIGO) with histopathology findings.
Kraljević Z; Visković K; Ledinsky M; Zadravec D; Grbavac I; Bilandzija M; Soljacić-Vranes H; Kuna K; Klasnić K; Krolo I
Coll Antropol; 2013 Jun; 37(2):561-8. PubMed ID: 23941005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stage-specific outcomes of patients with uterine leiomyosarcoma: a comparison of the international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics and american joint committee on cancer staging systems.
Zivanovic O; Leitao MM; Iasonos A; Jacks LM; Zhou Q; Abu-Rustum NR; Soslow RA; Juretzka MM; Chi DS; Barakat RR; Brennan MF; Hensley ML
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Apr; 27(12):2066-72. PubMed ID: 19255317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
