168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23792916)
1. Foaming in membrane bioreactors: identification of the causes.
Di Bella G; Torregrossa M
J Environ Manage; 2013 Oct; 128():453-61. PubMed ID: 23792916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of EPS concentration in MBR foaming: analysis of a submerged pilot plant.
Di Bella G; Torregrossa M; Viviani G
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1628-35. PubMed ID: 20933394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of EPS in fouling and foaming phenomena for a membrane bioreactor.
Cosenza A; Di Bella G; Mannina G; Torregrossa M
Bioresour Technol; 2013 Nov; 147():184-192. PubMed ID: 23994961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of chemical and biological surfactants on activated sludge of MBR system: microscopic analysis and foam test.
Capodici M; Di Bella G; Nicosia S; Torregrossa M
Bioresour Technol; 2015 Feb; 177():80-6. PubMed ID: 25479397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Activated sludge model (ASM) based modelling of membrane bioreactor (MBR) processes: a critical review with special regard to MBR specificities.
Fenu A; Guglielmi G; Jimenez J; Spèrandio M; Saroj D; Lesjean B; Brepols C; Thoeye C; Nopens I
Water Res; 2010 Aug; 44(15):4272-94. PubMed ID: 20619870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do biological-based strategies hold promise to biofouling control in MBRs?
Malaeb L; Le-Clech P; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ayoub GM; Saikaly PE
Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(15):5447-63. PubMed ID: 23863390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of disintegrated sludge recycling on membrane permeability in a membrane bioreactor combined with a turbulent jet flow ozone contactor.
Hwang BK; Kim JH; Ahn CH; Lee CH; Song JY; Ra YH
Water Res; 2010 Mar; 44(6):1833-40. PubMed ID: 20092865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
Bal AS; Dhagat NN
Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
Al-Halbouni D; Traber J; Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T; Tacke D; Janot A; Dott W; Hollender J
Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of soluble and bound EPS obtained from 2 submerged membrane bioreactors by 3D-EEM and HPSEC.
Domínguez Chabaliná L; Rodríguez Pastor M; Prats Rico D
Talanta; 2013 Oct; 115():706-12. PubMed ID: 24054651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An investigation into studying of the activated sludge foaming potential by using physicochemical parameters.
Hladikova K; Ruzickova I; Klucova P; Wanner J
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):525-8. PubMed ID: 12216681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fate of aromatic hydrocarbons in Italian municipal wastewater systems: an overview of wastewater treatment using conventional activated-sludge processes (CASP) and membrane bioreactors (MBRs).
Fatone F; Di Fabio S; Bolzonella D; Cecchi F
Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(1):93-104. PubMed ID: 20804998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling and biomass characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors.
Meng F; Shi B; Yang F; Zhang H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Sep; 30(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 17566785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Are filamentous mycolata important in foaming?
Davenport RJ; Curtis TP
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(1-2):529-33. PubMed ID: 12216682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evolution of filamentous bacteria during urban wastewater treatment by MBR.
Parada-Albarracín JA; Marin E; Pérez JI; Moreno B; Gómez MA
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2012; 47(6):863-72. PubMed ID: 22423993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Foaming Scum Index (FSI)--a new tool for the assessment and characterisation of biological mediated activated sludge foams.
Fryer M; Gray NF
J Environ Manage; 2012 Nov; 110():8-19. PubMed ID: 22705855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) properties and their effects on membrane fouling in a submerged membrane bioreactor.
Wang Z; Wu Z; Tang S
Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2504-12. PubMed ID: 19285331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost effective and advanced phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors for a decentralised wastewater technology.
Gnirss R; Lesjean B; Adam C; Buisson H
Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(12):133-9. PubMed ID: 12926680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sewage sludge treatment in a thermophilic membrane reactor (TMR): factors affecting foam formation.
Collivignarelli MC; Castagnola F; Sordi M; Bertanza G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Jan; 24(3):2316-2325. PubMed ID: 27815847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Filterability of membrane bioreactor (MBR) sludge: impacts of polyelectrolytes and mixing with conventional activated sludge.
Yigit NO; Civelekoglu G; Cinar O; Kitis M
Water Sci Technol; 2010; 61(3):659-69. PubMed ID: 20150702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
