199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23793511)
1. Localization of coherent sources by simultaneous MEG and EEG beamformer.
Hong JH; Ahn M; Kim K; Jun SC
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2013 Oct; 51(10):1121-35. PubMed ID: 23793511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of beamformer implementations for MEG source localization.
Jaiswal A; Nenonen J; Stenroos M; Gramfort A; Dalal SS; Westner BU; Litvak V; Mosher JC; Schoffelen JM; Witton C; Oostenveld R; Parkkonen L
Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116797. PubMed ID: 32278091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of beamformer and ICA for dynamic connectivity analysis: A simultaneous MEG-SEEG study.
Coelli S; Medina Villalon S; Bonini F; Velmurugan J; López-Madrona VJ; Carron R; Bartolomei F; Badier JM; Bénar CG
Neuroimage; 2023 Jan; 265():119806. PubMed ID: 36513288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Beamformer source analysis and connectivity on concurrent EEG and MEG data during voluntary movements.
Muthuraman M; Hellriegel H; Hoogenboom N; Anwar AR; Mideksa KG; Krause H; Schnitzler A; Deuschl G; Raethjen J
PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91441. PubMed ID: 24618596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Quantitative Evaluation in Estimating Sources Underlying Brain Oscillations Using Current Source Density Methods and Beamformer Approaches.
Halder T; Talwar S; Jaiswal AK; Banerjee A
eNeuro; 2019; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 31311804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensitivity of beamformer source analysis to deficiencies in forward modeling.
Steinsträter O; Sillekens S; Junghoefer M; Burger M; Wolters CH
Hum Brain Mapp; 2010 Dec; 31(12):1907-27. PubMed ID: 21086549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Localization accuracy of a common beamformer for the comparison of two conditions.
Lucena Gómez G; Peigneux P; Wens V; Bourguignon M
Neuroimage; 2021 Apr; 230():117793. PubMed ID: 33497769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complex patterns of spatially extended generators of epileptic activity: Comparison of source localization methods cMEM and 4-ExSo-MUSIC on high resolution EEG and MEG data.
Chowdhury RA; Merlet I; Birot G; Kobayashi E; Nica A; Biraben A; Wendling F; Lina JM; Albera L; Grova C
Neuroimage; 2016 Dec; 143():175-195. PubMed ID: 27561712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The LDA beamformer: Optimal estimation of ERP source time series using linear discriminant analysis.
Treder MS; Porbadnigk AK; Shahbazi Avarvand F; Müller KR; Blankertz B
Neuroimage; 2016 Apr; 129():279-291. PubMed ID: 26804780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Non-Gaussian probabilistic MEG source localisation based on kernel density estimation.
Mohseni HR; Kringelbach ML; Woolrich MW; Baker A; Aziz TZ; Probert-Smith P
Neuroimage; 2014 Feb; 87():444-64. PubMed ID: 24055702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Spatio-temporal Reconstruction of Neural Sources Using Indirect Dominant Mode Rejection.
Jafadideh AT; Asl BM
Brain Topogr; 2018 Jul; 31(4):591-607. PubMed ID: 29704076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment and elimination of the effects of head movement on MEG resting-state measures of oscillatory brain activity.
Messaritaki E; Koelewijn L; Dima DC; Williams GM; Perry G; Singh KD
Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():302-324. PubMed ID: 28735011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Source-space ICA for MEG source imaging.
Jonmohamadi Y; Jones RD
J Neural Eng; 2016 Feb; 13(1):016005. PubMed ID: 26644284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex.
Sharon D; Hämäläinen MS; Tootell RB; Halgren E; Belliveau JW
Neuroimage; 2007 Jul; 36(4):1225-35. PubMed ID: 17532230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Magnetoencephalography is more successful for screening and localizing frontal lobe epilepsy than electroencephalography.
Ossenblok P; de Munck JC; Colon A; Drolsbach W; Boon P
Epilepsia; 2007 Nov; 48(11):2139-49. PubMed ID: 17662061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple constrained minimum variance beamformer (MCMV) performance in connectivity analyses.
Nunes AS; Moiseev A; Kozhemiako N; Cheung T; Ribary U; Doesburg SM
Neuroimage; 2020 Mar; 208():116386. PubMed ID: 31786165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
