These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23794254)

  • 1. Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Hagmayer Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 23794254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which cognitive individual differences predict good Bayesian reasoning? Concurrent comparisons of underlying abilities.
    Brase G
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Feb; 49(2):235-248. PubMed ID: 32815106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of iconicity of visual displays on statistical reasoning: evidence in favor of the null hypothesis.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Juanchich M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Aug; 21(4):961-8. PubMed ID: 24307248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. What facilitates Bayesian reasoning? A crucial test of ecological rationality versus nested sets hypotheses.
    Brase G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):703-709. PubMed ID: 32885405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adding up to good Bayesian reasoning: Problem format manipulations and individual skill differences.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2017 Apr; 146(4):577-591. PubMed ID: 28383994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Now you Bayes, now you don't: effects of set-problem and frequency-format mental representations on statistical reasoning.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1465-73. PubMed ID: 25711182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Meta-analysis of the effect of natural frequencies on Bayesian reasoning.
    McDowell M; Jacobs P
    Psychol Bull; 2017 Dec; 143(12):1273-1312. PubMed ID: 29048176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reasoning strategy vs cognitive capacity as predictors of individual differences in reasoning performance.
    Thompson VA; Markovits H
    Cognition; 2021 Dec; 217():104866. PubMed ID: 34450394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactivity fosters Bayesian reasoning without instruction.
    Vallée-Tourangeau G; Abadie M; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Jun; 144(3):581-603. PubMed ID: 26030173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Individual differences in strategy use and performance during fault diagnosis.
    Shreeves M; Gugerty L; Moore D
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 Oct; 5(1):49. PubMed ID: 33095326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in relational reasoning.
    Gray ME; Holyoak KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):96-110. PubMed ID: 31317394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Reflective Mind: Examining Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Base Rate Neglect with fMRI.
    Vartanian O; Beatty EL; Smith I; Blackler K; Lam Q; Forbes S; De Neys W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jul; 30(7):1011-1022. PubMed ID: 29668391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How to train your Bayesian: a problem-representation transfer rather than a format-representation shift explains training effects.
    Sirota M; Kostovičová L; Vallée-Tourangeau F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 25283723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning.
    Oaksford M; Chater N
    Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Independent and interdependent self-construals do not predict analytic or holistic reasoning.
    Marquez RC; Ellwanger J
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Aug; 115(1):326-38. PubMed ID: 25153966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Good fences make for good neighbors but bad science: a review of what improves Bayesian reasoning and why.
    Brase GL; Hill WT
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():340. PubMed ID: 25873904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Causal explanation improves judgment under uncertainty, but rarely in a Bayesian way.
    Hayes BK; Ngo J; Hawkins GE; Newell BR
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jan; 46(1):112-131. PubMed ID: 28905276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Soccer science and the Bayes community: exploring the cognitive implications of modern scientific communication.
    Shrager J; Billman D; Convertino G; Massar JP; Pirolli P
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jan; 2(1):53-72. PubMed ID: 25163621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Representation facilitates reasoning: what natural frequencies are and what they are not.
    Hoffrage U; Gigerenzer G; Krauss S; Martignon L
    Cognition; 2002 Jul; 84(3):343-52. PubMed ID: 12044739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cognitive Success: A Consequentialist Account of Rationality in Cognition.
    Schurz G; Hertwig R
    Top Cogn Sci; 2019 Jan; 11(1):7-36. PubMed ID: 30663854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.