371 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23794405)
1. Caution regarding the choice of standard deviations to guide sample size calculations in clinical trials.
Chen H; Zhang N; Lu X; Chen S
Clin Trials; 2013 Aug; 10(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 23794405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sample size calculations in surgery: are they done correctly?
Maggard MA; O'Connell JB; Liu JH; Etzioni DA; Ko CY
Surgery; 2003 Aug; 134(2):275-9. PubMed ID: 12947329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Underpowering in randomized trials reporting a sample size calculation.
Vickers AJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 56(8):717-20. PubMed ID: 12954462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A simple method for calculating power based on a prior trial.
Borm GF; Bloem BR; Munneke M; Teerenstra S
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Sep; 63(9):992-7. PubMed ID: 20573484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Blinded sample size recalculation for clinical trials with normal data and baseline adjusted analysis.
Friede T; Kieser M
Pharm Stat; 2011; 10(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 19943322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sample size estimation: an overview with applications to orthodontic clinical trial designs.
Pandis N; Polychronopoulou A; Eliades T
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e141-6. PubMed ID: 21967951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Consultants' forum: should post hoc sample size calculations be done?
Walters SJ
Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18416448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical power and effect sizes of clinical neuropsychology research.
Bezeau S; Graves R
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Jun; 23(3):399-406. PubMed ID: 11419453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Statistical power of negative randomized controlled trials presented at American Society for Clinical Oncology annual meetings.
Bedard PL; Krzyzanowska MK; Pintilie M; Tannock IF
J Clin Oncol; 2007 Aug; 25(23):3482-7. PubMed ID: 17687153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Some thoughts on sample size: a Bayesian-frequentist hybrid approach.
Gordon Lan KK; Wittes JT
Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):561-9. PubMed ID: 22865839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The prevalence of underpowered randomized clinical trials in rheumatology.
Keen HI; Pile K; Hill CL
J Rheumatol; 2005 Nov; 32(11):2083-8. PubMed ID: 16265683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calculation of sample size for stroke trials assessing functional outcome: comparison of binary and ordinal approaches.
Optimising Analysis of Stroke Trials Collaboration
Int J Stroke; 2008 May; 3(2):78-84. PubMed ID: 18705999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting of minimum clinically important differences in surgical trials.
Kashani I; Hall JL; Hall JC
ANZ J Surg; 2009 Apr; 79(4):301-4. PubMed ID: 19432721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing quality of reports on randomized clinical trials in nursing journals.
Parent N; Hanley JA
Can J Cardiovasc Nurs; 2009; 19(2):25-39. PubMed ID: 19517902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inadequate statistical power of negative clinical trials in urological literature.
Breau RH; Carnat TA; Gaboury I
J Urol; 2006 Jul; 176(1):263-6. PubMed ID: 16753417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Sample size calculation in survival trials accounting for time-varying relationship between noncompliance and risk of outcome event.
Li B; Grambsch P
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(4):349-59. PubMed ID: 17060209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample size calculations for crossover thorough QT studies: satisfaction of regulatory threshold and assay sensitivity.
Anand SP; Murray SC; Koch GG
J Biopharm Stat; 2010 May; 20(3):587-603. PubMed ID: 20358438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Power of Low Back Pain Trials: A Systematic Review of Power, Sample Size, and Reporting of Sample Size Calculations Over Time, in Trials Published Between 1980 and 2012.
Froud R; Rajendran D; Patel S; Bright P; Bjørkli T; Eldridge S; Buchbinder R; Underwood M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2017 Jun; 42(11):E680-E686. PubMed ID: 27792111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The reassessment of trial perspectives from interim data--a critical view.
Bauer P; Koenig F
Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(1):23-36. PubMed ID: 16220517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Empirical Bayes models of Poisson clinical trials and sample size determination.
Zaslavsky BG
Pharm Stat; 2010; 9(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 19513984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
