447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23795663)
1. Multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the performance of 22 gauge versus 25 gauge EUS-FNA needles in solid masses.
Vilmann P; Săftoiu A; Hollerbach S; Skov BG; Linnemann D; Popescu CF; Wellmann A; Gorunescu F; Clementsen P; Freund U; Flemming P; Hassan H; Gheonea DI; Streba L; Ioncică AM; Streba CT
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jul; 48(7):877-83. PubMed ID: 23795663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions.
Camellini L; Carlinfante G; Azzolini F; Iori V; Cavina M; Sereni G; Decembrino F; Gallo C; Tamagnini I; Valli R; Piana S; Campari C; Gardini G; Sassatelli R
Endoscopy; 2011 Aug; 43(8):709-15. PubMed ID: 21611946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses.
Lee JK; Lee KT; Choi ER; Jang TH; Jang KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2013 Jun; 48(6):752-7. PubMed ID: 23600919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of a new histology needle for EUS-guided fine needle biopsy: A retrospective multicenter study.
Attili F; Rimbaş M; Fantin A; Fabbri C; Carrara S; Di Maurizio L; Gibiino G; Repici A; Inzani F; Gasbarrini A; Costamagna G; Larghi A
Dig Liver Dis; 2018 May; 50(5):469-474. PubMed ID: 29477347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge
Siddique DA; Rahal MA; Trevino K; Wu HH; Al-Haddad MA
Anticancer Res; 2020 Oct; 40(10):5845-5851. PubMed ID: 32988914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Wet suction technique (WEST)": a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions.
Attam R; Arain MA; Bloechl SJ; Trikudanathan G; Munigala S; Bakman Y; Singh M; Wallace T; Henderson JB; Catalano MF; Guda NM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015; 81(6):1401-7. PubMed ID: 25733127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh DH; Choi K; Gu S; Cho J; Jang KT; Woo YS; Lee KT; Lee JK; Lee KH
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jan; 53(1):94-99. PubMed ID: 29065734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
Abe Y; Kawakami H; Oba K; Hayashi T; Yasuda I; Mukai T; Isayama H; Ishiwatari H; Doi S; Nakashima M; Yamamoto N; Kuwatani M; Mitsuhashi T; Hasegawa T; Hirose Y; Yamada T; Tanaka M; Sakamoto N;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2015 Nov; 82(5):837-844.e1. PubMed ID: 25936452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling.
Kim GH; Cho YK; Kim EY; Kim HK; Cho JW; Lee TH; Moon JS;
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):347-54. PubMed ID: 24325591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 22-Gauge biopsy needles have a better histological diagnostic yield in the discrimination of specific pancreatic solid neoplasms.
Jiang H; Guo J; Wang K; Zhu H; Chen J; Xu C; Wang D; Jin Z
Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 54(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 30731044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of 22G fine-needle aspiration (FNA) versus fine-needle biopsy (FNB) for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: a prospective comparison study.
Tian L; Tang AL; Zhang L; Liu XW; Li JB; Wang F; Shen SR; Wang XY
Surg Endosc; 2018 Aug; 32(8):3533-3539. PubMed ID: 29404729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of 22G standard and Franseen needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Study protocol for a controlled trial.
Itonaga M; Yasukawa S; Shimokawa T; Takenaka M; Fukutake N; Ogura T; Sakagami J; Shiomi H; Okura Y; Inatomi O; Matsumoto H; Kurita A; Suzuki A; Tanaka K; Kitano M
Trials; 2019 Dec; 20(1):816. PubMed ID: 31888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sakamoto H; Kitano M; Komaki T; Noda K; Chikugo T; Dote K; Takeyama Y; Das K; Yamao K; Kudo M
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Mar; 24(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 19032453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study.
Hucl T; Wee E; Anuradha S; Gupta R; Ramchandani M; Rakesh K; Shrestha R; Reddy DN; Lakhtakia S
Endoscopy; 2013 Oct; 45(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 24068588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The prospective randomized, controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration using 22G and 19G aspiration needles for solid pancreatic or peripancreatic masses.
Song TJ; Kim JH; Lee SS; Eum JB; Moon SH; Park DY; Seo DW; Lee SK; Jang SJ; Yun SC; Kim MH
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Aug; 105(8):1739-45. PubMed ID: 20216532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 22-gauge core
Sterlacci W; Sioulas AD; Veits L; Gönüllü P; Schachschal G; Groth S; Anders M; Kontos CK; Topalidis T; Hinsch A; Vieth M; Rösch T; Denzer UW
World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8820-8830. PubMed ID: 27818598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Guedes HG; Moura DTH; Duarte RB; Cordero MAC; Santos MELD; Cheng S; Matuguma SE; Chaves DM; Bernardo WM; Moura EGH
Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2018; 73():e261. PubMed ID: 29451621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Randomized controlled trial comparing stylet-free endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with 22-G and 25-G needles.
Gimeno-García AZ; Elwassief A; Paquin SC; Gariépy G; Sahai AV
Dig Endosc; 2014 May; 26(3):467-73. PubMed ID: 24877242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.
Bang JY; Hebert-Magee S; Trevino J; Ramesh J; Varadarajulu S
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Aug; 76(2):321-7. PubMed ID: 22658389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
