These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23796884)

  • 1. In silico models for predicting ready biodegradability under REACH: a comparative study.
    Pizzo F; Lombardo A; Manganaro A; Benfenati E
    Sci Total Environ; 2013 Oct; 463-464():161-8. PubMed ID: 23796884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of ready biodegradation estimation methods for fragrance materials.
    Boethling R
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 Nov; 497-498():60-67. PubMed ID: 25119791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new in silico classification model for ready biodegradability, based on molecular fragments.
    Lombardo A; Pizzo F; Benfenati E; Manganaro A; Ferrari T; Gini G
    Chemosphere; 2014 Aug; 108():10-6. PubMed ID: 24875906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation and comparison of benchmark QSAR models to predict a relevant REACH endpoint: The bioconcentration factor (BCF).
    Gissi A; Lombardo A; Roncaglioni A; Gadaleta D; Mangiatordi GF; Nicolotti O; Benfenati E
    Environ Res; 2015 Feb; 137():398-409. PubMed ID: 25616163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prioritization of in silico models and molecular descriptors for the assessment of ready biodegradability.
    Fernández A; Rallo R; Giralt F
    Environ Res; 2015 Oct; 142():161-8. PubMed ID: 26160046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predicting ready biodegradability of premanufacture notice chemicals.
    Boethling RS; Lynch DG; Thom GC
    Environ Toxicol Chem; 2003 Apr; 22(4):837-44. PubMed ID: 12685720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models for ready biodegradability of chemicals.
    Mansouri K; Ringsted T; Ballabio D; Todeschini R; Consonni V
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):867-78. PubMed ID: 23469921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of QSAR models for the prediction of ames genotoxicity: a retrospective exercise on the chemical substances registered under the EU REACH regulation.
    Cassano A; Raitano G; Mombelli E; Fernández A; Cester J; Roncaglioni A; Benfenati E
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2014; 32(3):273-98. PubMed ID: 25226221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. PBT assessment using the revised annex XIII of REACH: a comparison with other regulatory frameworks.
    Moermond CT; Janssen MP; de Knecht JA; Montforts MH; Peijnenburg WJ; Zweers PG; Sijm DT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2012 Apr; 8(2):359-71. PubMed ID: 22006646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. External validation of EPIWIN biodegradation models.
    Posthumus R; Traas TP; Peijnenburg WJ; Hulzebos EM
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2005; 16(1-2):135-48. PubMed ID: 15844447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modelling of ready biodegradability based on combined public and industrial data sources.
    Lunghini F; Marcou G; Gantzer P; Azam P; Horvath D; Van Miert E; Varnek A
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2020 Mar; 31(3):171-186. PubMed ID: 31858821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computer models versus reality: how well do in silico models currently predict the sensitization potential of a substance.
    Teubner W; Mehling A; Schuster PX; Guth K; Worth A; Burton J; van Ravenzwaay B; Landsiedel R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2013 Dec; 67(3):468-85. PubMed ID: 24090701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of in silico models for prediction of mutagenicity.
    Bakhtyari NG; Raitano G; Benfenati E; Martin T; Young D
    J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev; 2013; 31(1):45-66. PubMed ID: 23534394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. External validation of structure-biodegradation relationship (SBR) models for predicting the biodegradability of xenobiotics.
    Devillers J; Pandard P; Richard B
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2013; 24(12):979-93. PubMed ID: 24313438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Predicting PBT and CMR properties of substances of very high concern (SVHCs) using QSAR models, and application for K-REACH.
    Moon J; Lee B; Ra JS; Kim KT
    Toxicol Rep; 2020; 7():995-1000. PubMed ID: 32874922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. CATALOGIC 301C model - validation and improvement.
    Dimitrova NH; Dermen IA; Todorova ND; Vasilev KG; Dimitrov SD; Mekenyan OG; Ikenaga Y; Aoyagi T; Zaitsu Y; Hamaguchi C
    SAR QSAR Environ Res; 2017 Jun; 28(6):511-524. PubMed ID: 28728491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation and application of models for the prediction of ready biodegradability in the MITI-I test.
    Rorije E; Loonen H; Müller M; Klopman G; Peijnenburg WJ
    Chemosphere; 1999 Mar; 38(6):1409-17. PubMed ID: 10070729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards a proportionality assessment of risk reduction measures aimed at restricting the use of persistent and bioaccumulative substances.
    Oosterhuis F; Brouwer R; Janssen M; Verhoeven J; Luttikhuizen C
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2017 Nov; 13(6):1100-1112. PubMed ID: 28548694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Estimating biodegradation half-lives for use in chemical screening.
    Aronson D; Boethling R; Howard P; Stiteler W
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jun; 63(11):1953-60. PubMed ID: 16297427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.