These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23797148)

  • 1. How do taxonomic versus thematic relations impact similarity and difference judgments? An ERP study.
    Chen Q; Li P; Xi L; Li F; Lei Y; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2013 Nov; 90(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 23797148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The processing of perceptual similarity with different features or spatial relations as revealed by P2/P300 amplitude.
    Chen Q; Liang X; Li P; Ye C; Li F; Lei Y; Li H
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Mar; 95(3):379-87. PubMed ID: 25645026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Similarity judgments predict N400 amplitude differences between taxonomic category members and thematic associates.
    Honke G; Kurtz KJ; Laszlo S
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Apr; 141():107388. PubMed ID: 32081617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG theta and alpha responses reveal qualitative differences in processing taxonomic versus thematic semantic relationships.
    Maguire MJ; Brier MR; Ferree TC
    Brain Lang; 2010 Jul; 114(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 20403632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in the perception of similarity and difference.
    Simmons S; Estes Z
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):781-95. PubMed ID: 18721916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Automatic processing of taxonomic and thematic relations in semantic priming - Differentiation by early N400 and late frontal negativity.
    Chen Q; Ye C; Liang X; Cao B; Lei Y; Li H
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Nov; 64():54-62. PubMed ID: 25234647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automatic processing of semantic relations in fMRI: neural activation during semantic priming of taxonomic and thematic categories.
    Sachs O; Weis S; Zellagui N; Huber W; Zvyagintsev M; Mathiak K; Kircher T
    Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1218():194-205. PubMed ID: 18514168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A saw is first identified as an object used on wood: ERP evidence for temporal differences between Thematic and Functional similarity relations.
    Wamain Y; Pluciennicka E; Kalénine S
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 May; 71():28-37. PubMed ID: 25725356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Categorical and thematic knowledge representation in the brain: neural correlates of taxonomic and thematic conceptual relations.
    Sachs O; Weis S; Krings T; Huber W; Kircher T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(2):409-18. PubMed ID: 17920085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Taxonomic relations evoke more fear than thematic relations after fear conditioning: An EEG study.
    Lei Y; Mei Y; Dai Y; Peng W
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Jan; 167():107099. PubMed ID: 31698057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acquiring concepts and features of novel words by two types of learning: direct mapping and inference.
    Chen S; Wang L; Yang Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Apr; 56():204-18. PubMed ID: 24480035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech and span: working memory capacity impacts the use of animacy but not of world knowledge during spoken sentence comprehension.
    Nakano H; Saron C; Swaab TY
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Dec; 22(12):2886-98. PubMed ID: 19929760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Core disgust and moral disgust are related to distinct spatiotemporal patterns of neural processing: an event-related potential study.
    Luo Y; Shen W; Zhang Y; Feng TY; Huang H; Li H
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Oct; 94(2):242-8. PubMed ID: 23816951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Brain potentials for derivational morphology: an ERP study of deadjectival nominalizations in Spanish.
    Havas V; Rodríguez-Fornells A; Clahsen H
    Brain Lang; 2012 Mar; 120(3):332-44. PubMed ID: 22169628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Word learning and individual differences in word learning reflected in event-related potentials.
    Perfetti CA; Wlotko EW; Hart LA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Nov; 31(6):1281-92. PubMed ID: 16393047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Predictability and novelty in literal language comprehension: an ERP study.
    Davenport T; Coulson S
    Brain Res; 2011 Oct; 1418():70-82. PubMed ID: 21925647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contextual modulation of N400 amplitude to lexically ambiguous words.
    Titone DA; Salisbury DF
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Aug; 55(3):470-8. PubMed ID: 15223192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Taxonomic and thematic categories: Neural correlates of categorization in an auditory-to-visual priming task using fMRI.
    Sass K; Sachs O; Krach S; Kircher T
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():78-87. PubMed ID: 19306848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Judgments of learning do not reduce to memory encoding operations: event-related potential evidence for distinct metacognitive processes.
    Skavhaug IM; Wilding EL; Donaldson DI
    Brain Res; 2010 Mar; 1318():87-95. PubMed ID: 19968975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potential (ERP) evidence for fluency-based recognition memory.
    Andrew Leynes P; Zish K
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3240-9. PubMed ID: 23063967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.