These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. A bottom-up model of spatial attention predicts human error patterns in rapid scene recognition. Einhäuser W; Mundhenk TN; Baldi P; Koch C; Itti L J Vis; 2007 Jul; 7(10):6.1-13. PubMed ID: 17997675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A crowding model of visual clutter. van den Berg R; Cornelissen FW; Roerdink JB J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):24.1-11. PubMed ID: 19757933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Regional effects of clutter on human target detection performance. Asher MF; Tolhurst DJ; Troscianko T; Gilchrist ID J Vis; 2013 Apr; 13(5):. PubMed ID: 23620535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Structural texture similarity metrics for image analysis and retrieval. Zujovic J; Pappas TN; Neuhoff DL IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jul; 22(7):2545-58. PubMed ID: 23481854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A psychovisual quality metric in free-energy principle. Zhai G; Wu X; Yang X; Lin W; Zhang W IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jan; 21(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 21724508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic computation of an image's statistical surprise predicts performance of human observers on a natural image detection task. Mundhenk TN; Einhäuser W; Itti L Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(13):1620-37. PubMed ID: 19351543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues. Eckstein MP; Pham BT; Shimozaki SS Vision Res; 2004 Jun; 44(12):1193-207. PubMed ID: 15066385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selective visual attention based clutter metric with human visual system adaptability. Zheng B; Wang XD; Huang JT; Wang J; Jiang Y Appl Opt; 2016 Sep; 55(27):7700-6. PubMed ID: 27661600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spread spectrum image watermarking based on perceptual quality metric. Zhang F; Liu W; Lin W; Ngan KN IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Nov; 20(11):3207-18. PubMed ID: 21518660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Components of bottom-up gaze allocation in natural images. Peters RJ; Iyer A; Itti L; Koch C Vision Res; 2005 Aug; 45(18):2397-416. PubMed ID: 15935435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bayesian Contrast Measures and Clutter Distribution Determinants of Human Target Detection. Novak A; Armstrong N; Caelli T; Blair I IEEE Trans Image Process; 2017 Mar; 26(3):1115-1126. PubMed ID: 28026770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clutter in electronic medical records: examining its performance and attentional costs using eye tracking. Moacdieh N; Sarter N Hum Factors; 2015 Jun; 57(4):591-606. PubMed ID: 25850110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Perceptual quality metric with internal generative mechanism. Wu J; Lin W; Shi G; Liu A IEEE Trans Image Process; 2013 Jan; 22(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 22910116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measuring search efficiency in complex visual search tasks: global and local clutter. Beck MR; Lohrenz MC; Trafton JG J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Sep; 16(3):238-50. PubMed ID: 20853984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Natural image clutter degrades overt search performance independently of set size. Semizer Y; Michel MM J Vis; 2019 Apr; 19(4):1. PubMed ID: 30933237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Compressed image quality metric based on perceptually weighted distortion. Hu S; Jin L; Wang H; Zhang Y; Kwong S; Kuo CC IEEE Trans Image Process; 2015 Dec; 24(12):5594-608. PubMed ID: 26415170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]