BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

501 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23797498)

  • 1. Lumbar spinous process splitting decompression provides equivalent outcomes to conventional midline decompression in degenerative lumbar canal stenosis: a prospective, randomized controlled study of 51 patients.
    Rajasekaran S; Thomas A; Kanna RM; Prasad Shetty A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):1737-43. PubMed ID: 23797498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Kawakami M; Nakao S; Fukui D; Kadosaka Y; Matsuoka T; Yamada H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):E1461-8. PubMed ID: 23778375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study.
    Watanabe K; Matsumoto M; Ikegami T; Nishiwaki Y; Tsuji T; Ishii K; Ogawa Y; Takaishi H; Nakamura M; Toyama Y; Chiba K
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Jan; 14(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 21142464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: technical note.
    Liu X; Yuan S; Tian Y
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E732-7. PubMed ID: 23466507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. X-stop versus decompressive surgery for lumbar neurogenic intermittent claudication: randomized controlled trial with 2-year follow-up.
    Strömqvist BH; Berg S; Gerdhem P; Johnsson R; Möller A; Sahlstrand T; Soliman A; Tullberg T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Aug; 38(17):1436-42. PubMed ID: 23403549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Microendoscopy-assisted muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical results of consecutive 105 cases with more than 3-year follow-up.
    Yoshimoto M; Miyakawa T; Takebayashi T; Ida K; Tanimoto K; Kawamura S; Yamashita T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Mar; 39(5):E318-25. PubMed ID: 24365896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Epidural fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after lumbar canal decompression: a randomized controlled trial.
    Guilfoyle MR; Mannion RJ; Mitchell P; Thomson S
    Spine J; 2012 Aug; 12(8):646-51. PubMed ID: 22926408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spinous process splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a critical appraisal.
    Lee DY; Lee SH
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Aug; 51(4):204-7. PubMed ID: 18683110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of posterior decompression techniques compared with conventional laminectomy for lumbar stenosis.
    Overdevest GM; Jacobs W; Vleggeert-Lankamp C; Thomé C; Gunzburg R; Peul W
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2015 Mar; (3):CD010036. PubMed ID: 25760812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A prospective comparative study of 2 minimally invasive decompression procedures for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression (ULBD) versus muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression (MILD).
    Arai Y; Hirai T; Yoshii T; Sakai K; Kato T; Enomoto M; Matsumoto R; Yamada T; Kawabata S; Shinomiya K; Okawa A
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Feb; 39(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 24299721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the effect of 3 different approaches to the lumbar spinal canal on postoperative paraspinal muscle damage.
    Kim K; Isu T; Sugawara A; Matsumoto R; Isobe M
    Surg Neurol; 2008 Feb; 69(2):109-13; discussion 113. PubMed ID: 18261638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Split-spinous process laminotomy and discectomy for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a preliminary report.
    Cho DY; Lin HL; Lee WY; Lee HC
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2007 Mar; 6(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 17355022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Postoperative outcome after modified unilateral-approach microendoscopic midline decompression for degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Yagi M; Okada E; Ninomiya K; Kihara M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Apr; 10(4):293-9. PubMed ID: 19441985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Aperius interspinous implant versus open surgical decompression in lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Postacchini R; Ferrari E; Cinotti G; Menchetti PP; Postacchini F
    Spine J; 2011 Oct; 11(10):933-9. PubMed ID: 22005077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Study of percutaneous lumbar decompression and treatment algorithm for patients suffering from neurogenic claudication.
    Deer TR; Kim CK; Bowman RG; Ranson MT; Yee BS
    Pain Physician; 2012; 15(6):451-60. PubMed ID: 23159960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unilateral approach for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a minimal invasive surgery.
    Usman M; Ali M; Khanzada K; Ishaq M; Naeem-ul-Haq ; Aman R; Ali M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Dec; 23(12):852-6. PubMed ID: 24304987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. One-staged combined cervical and lumbar decompression for patients with tandem spinal stenosis on cervical and lumbar spine: analyses of clinical outcomes with minimum 3 years follow-up.
    Kikuike K; Miyamoto K; Hosoe H; Shimizu K
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Dec; 22(8):593-601. PubMed ID: 19956034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.