164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23797500)
1. Automatic Cobb angle determination from radiographic images.
Sardjono TA; Wilkinson MH; Veldhuizen AG; van Ooijen PM; Purnama KE; Verkerke GJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Sep; 38(20):E1256-62. PubMed ID: 23797500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability analysis of a smartphone-aided measurement method for the Cobb angle of scoliosis.
Qiao J; Liu Z; Xu L; Wu T; Zheng X; Zhu Z; Zhu F; Qian B; Qiu Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2012 Jun; 25(4):E88-92. PubMed ID: 22237178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A computer-aided Cobb angle measurement method and its reliability.
Zhang J; Lou E; Shi X; Wang Y; Hill DL; Raso JV; Le LH; Lv L
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Aug; 23(6):383-7. PubMed ID: 20124919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a computer-aided method for measuring the Cobb angle on chest X-rays.
Pan Y; Chen Q; Chen T; Wang H; Zhu X; Fang Z; Lu Y
Eur Spine J; 2019 Dec; 28(12):3035-3043. PubMed ID: 31446493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Centroid method: reliable method to determine the coronal curvature of scoliosis: a case control study comparing with the Cobb method.
Hong JY; Suh SW; Modi HN; Hur CY; Song HR; Ryu JH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E855-61. PubMed ID: 21289563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Radiographic scoliosis angle estimation: spline-based measurement reveals superior reliability compared to traditional COBB method.
Bernstein P; Metzler J; Weinzierl M; Seifert C; Kisel W; Wacker M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Mar; 30(3):676-685. PubMed ID: 32856177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An integrative framework for 3D cobb angle measurement on CT images.
Huo X; Tan JQ; Qian J; Cheng L; Jing JH; Shao K; Li BN
Comput Biol Med; 2017 Mar; 82():111-118. PubMed ID: 28183004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supine magnetic resonance imaging Cobb measurements for idiopathic scoliosis are linearly related to measurements from standing plain radiographs.
Lee MC; Solomito M; Patel A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(11):E656-61. PubMed ID: 23429689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability assessment of Cobb angle measurements using manual and digital methods.
Tanure MC; Pinheiro AP; Oliveira AS
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):769-74. PubMed ID: 20359959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy and repeatability of a new method for measuring scoliosis curvature.
He JW; Yan ZH; Liu J; Yu ZK; Wang XY; Bai GH; Ye XJ; Zhang X
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):E323-9. PubMed ID: 19531987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability analysis of Cobb angle measurements of congenital scoliosis using X-ray and 3D-CT images.
Tauchi R; Tsuji T; Cahill PJ; Flynn JM; Flynn JM; Glotzbecker M; El-Hawary R; Heflin JA; Imagama S; Joshi AP; Nohara A; Ramirez N; Roye DP; Saito T; Sawyer JR; Smith JT; Kawakami N
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2016 Jan; 26(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26377663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variation in Cobb angle measurements in scoliosis.
Pruijs JE; Hageman MA; Keessen W; van der Meer R; van Wieringen JC
Skeletal Radiol; 1994 Oct; 23(7):517-20. PubMed ID: 7824978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of quantitative analysis on digital images of the scoliotic spine.
Cheung J; Wever DJ; Veldhuizen AG; Klein JP; Verdonck B; Nijlunsing R; Cool JC; Van Horn JR
Eur Spine J; 2002 Dec; 11(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 12522710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. W-Transformer: Accurate Cobb angles estimation by using a transformer-based hybrid structure.
Yao Y; Yu W; Gao Y; Dong J; Xiao Q; Huang B; Shi Z
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3246-3262. PubMed ID: 35194794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better than digitized small films?
De Carvalho A; Vialle R; Thomsen L; Amzallag J; Cluzel G; le Pointe HD; Mary P
Eur Spine J; 2007 Oct; 16(10):1615-20. PubMed ID: 17619912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A computerized method for evaluating scoliotic deformities using elliptical pattern recognition in X-ray spine images.
Pinheiro AP; Coelho JC; Veiga ACP; Vrtovec T
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():85-92. PubMed ID: 29852970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-assisted Cobb angle measurement on posteroanterior radiographs.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill D; Raso J; Wang Y
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 140():151-6. PubMed ID: 18810018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of radiographic measures for infantile idiopathic scoliosis.
Corona J; Sanders JO; Luhmann SJ; Diab M; Vitale MG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(12):e86. PubMed ID: 22717838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and accuracy analysis of a new semiautomatic radiographic measurement software in adult scoliosis.
Aubin CE; Bellefleur C; Joncas J; de Lanauze D; Kadoury S; Blanke K; Parent S; Labelle H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 May; 36(12):E780-90. PubMed ID: 21224755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
