165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23797500)
21. Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis.
Stokes IA; Aronsson DD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Mar; 31(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 16540871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Validity and reliability of active shape models for the estimation of cobb angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Allen S; Parent E; Khorasani M; Hill DL; Lou E; Raso JV
J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):208-18. PubMed ID: 17340228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reliability of radiographic parameters in neuromuscular scoliosis.
Gupta MC; Wijesekera S; Sossan A; Martin L; Vogel LC; Boakes JL; Lerman JA; McDonald CM; Betz RR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):691-5. PubMed ID: 17413476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Cobb Angle Measurement of Spine from X-Ray Images Using Convolutional Neural Network.
Horng MH; Kuok CP; Fu MJ; Lin CJ; Sun YN
Comput Math Methods Med; 2019; 2019():6357171. PubMed ID: 30996731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Convolutional Neural Network to Segment Laminae on 3D Ultrasound Spinal Images to Assist Cobb Angle Measurement.
Wong J; Reformat M; Parent E; Lou E
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 50(4):401-412. PubMed ID: 35201548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Use of the smartphone for end vertebra selection in scoliosis.
Pepe M; Kocadal O; Iyigun A; Gunes Z; Aksahin E; Aktekin CN
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2017 Mar; 51(2):146-149. PubMed ID: 28077254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Content-based image retrieval of spine radiographs with scoliosis.
Dinesh Kumar VP; Thomas T; Menon KV
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jun; 22(4):284-9. PubMed ID: 19494749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measuring procedures to determine the Cobb angle in idiopathic scoliosis: a systematic review.
Langensiepen S; Semler O; Sobottke R; Fricke O; Franklin J; Schönau E; Eysel P
Eur Spine J; 2013 Nov; 22(11):2360-71. PubMed ID: 23443679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of conventional full spine radiographs and fluoroscopic scanning method in young patients with idiopathic scoliosis].
Schaefer J; Kluba T; Niemeyer T; Hahnfeldt T; Vonthein R; Kottke R; Kamm KF; Claussen C
Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16021543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automatic Cobb measurement of scoliosis based on fuzzy Hough Transform with vertebral shape prior.
Zhang J; Lou E; Le LH; Hill DL; Raso JV; Wang Y
J Digit Imaging; 2009 Oct; 22(5):463-72. PubMed ID: 18516643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy and reliability of coronal and sagittal spinal curvature data based on patient-specific three-dimensional models created by the EOS 2D/3D imaging system.
Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
Spine J; 2012 Nov; 12(11):1052-9. PubMed ID: 23102842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. Intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles.
Shea KG; Stevens PM; Nelson M; Smith JT; Masters KS; Yandow S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(5):551-5. PubMed ID: 9530786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A Novel Computer-Aided Method to Evaluate Scoliosis Curvature using Polynomial Math Function.
D F GL; J CE; M D GL; V RR; A P CM; M G RR; H YY; Y ZH; H JW
J Biomed Phys Eng; 2019 Oct; 9(5):517-524. PubMed ID: 31750265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Cobb angle measurement: endplate versus pedicle as bony landmarks for measurement: a statistical analysis.
Mehta SS; Modi HN; Srinivasalu S; Chen T; Suh SW; Yang JH; Song HR
J Pediatr Orthop; 2009; 29(7):749-54. PubMed ID: 20104157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Automatic Assessment of Ultrasound Curvature Angle for Scoliosis Detection Using 3-D Ultrasound Volume Projection Imaging.
Banerjee S; Huang Z; Lyu J; Leung FHF; Lee T; Yang D; Zheng Y; McAviney J; Ling SH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2024 May; 50(5):647-660. PubMed ID: 38355361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Automated comprehensive Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis assessment using MVC-Net.
Wu H; Bailey C; Rasoulinejad P; Li S
Med Image Anal; 2018 Aug; 48():1-11. PubMed ID: 29803920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Unsupervised local center of mass based scoliosis spinal segmentation and Cobb angle measurement.
Sikkandar MY; Alhashim MM; Alassaf A; AlMohimeed I; Alhussaini K; Aleid A; Almutairi MJ; Alshammari SH; Asiri YN; Sabarunisha Begum S
PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0300685. PubMed ID: 38512969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Radiation-free quantitative assessment of scoliosis: a multi center prospective study.
Ovadia D; Bar-On E; Fragnière B; Rigo M; Dickman D; Leitner J; Wientroub S; Dubousset J
Eur Spine J; 2007 Jan; 16(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16705434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Is radiation-free diagnostic monitoring of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis feasible using upright positional magnetic resonance imaging?
Diefenbach C; Lonner BS; Auerbach JD; Bharucha N; Dean LE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Apr; 38(7):576-80. PubMed ID: 23324938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Manual and computerized measurement of sagittal vertebral inclination in computed tomography images.
Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernuš F
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):E875-81. PubMed ID: 21289562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
