403 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23797505)
1. Novel 3-dimensional motion analysis method for measuring the lumbar spine range of motion: repeatability and reliability compared with an electrogoniometer.
Tojima M; Ogata N; Yozu A; Sumitani M; Haga N
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(21):E1327-33. PubMed ID: 23797505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Between-session reliability of opto-electronic motion capture in measuring sagittal posture and 3-D ranges of motion of the thoracolumbar spine.
Mousavi SJ; Tromp R; Swann MC; White AP; Anderson DE
J Biomech; 2018 Oct; 79():248-252. PubMed ID: 30213648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Normal functional range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Apr; 23(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 20065869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validity and reliability of the metric measurements in the assessment of lumbar spine motion in patients with ankylosing spondylitis.
Rezvani A; Ergin O; Karacan I; Oncu M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Sep; 37(19):E1189-96. PubMed ID: 22614802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Normal functional range of motion of the cervical spine during 15 activities of daily living.
Bible JE; Biswas D; Miller CP; Whang PG; Grauer JN
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Feb; 23(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20051924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinically acceptable agreement between the ViMove wireless motion sensor system and the Vicon motion capture system when measuring lumbar region inclination motion in the sagittal and coronal planes.
Mjøsund HL; Boyle E; Kjaer P; Mieritz RM; Skallgård T; Kent P
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Mar; 18(1):124. PubMed ID: 28327115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sacroiliac joint motion in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders.
Nagamoto Y; Iwasaki M; Sakaura H; Sugiura T; Fujimori T; Matsuo Y; Kashii M; Murase T; Yoshikawa H; Sugamoto K
J Neurosurg Spine; 2015 Aug; 23(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 25978076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neck range of motion measurements using a new three-dimensional motion analysis system: validity and repeatability.
Inokuchi H; Tojima M; Mano H; Ishikawa Y; Ogata N; Haga N
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2807-15. PubMed ID: 25847728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Measurement of segmental lumbar spine flexion and extension using ultrasound imaging.
Chleboun GS; Amway MJ; Hill JG; Root KJ; Murray HC; Sergeev AV
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Oct; 42(10):880-5. PubMed ID: 22814284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Lumbar spine side bending is reduced in end range extension compared to neutral and end range flexion postures.
Ebert R; Campbell A; Kemp-Smith K; O'Sullivan P
Man Ther; 2014 Apr; 19(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 24315299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reliability of computer-assisted lumbar intervertebral measurements using a novel vertebral motion analysis system.
Yeager MS; Cook DJ; Cheng BC
Spine J; 2014 Feb; 14(2):274-81. PubMed ID: 24239805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Individual characteristics of reliable lumbar coupling motions.
Yun WS; Kim H; Ahn JH; Park YB; Park YJ
Eur Spine J; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1917-25. PubMed ID: 26100279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validity and reliability of skin markers for measurement of intersegmental mobility at L2-3 and L3-4 during lateral bending in healthy individuals: a fluoroscopy study.
Hashemirad F; Hatef B; Jaberzadeh S; Ale Agha N
J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2013 Jan; 17(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23294683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliability of the lumbar flexion, lumbar extension, and passive straight leg raise test in normal populations embedded within a complete physical examination.
Hunt DG; Zuberbier OA; Kozlowski AJ; Robinson J; Berkowitz J; Schultz IZ; Milner RA; Crook JM; Turk DC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Dec; 26(24):2714-8. PubMed ID: 11740361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Range of motion and orientation of the lumbar facet joints in vivo.
Kozanek M; Wang S; Passias PG; Xia Q; Li G; Bono CM; Wood KB; Li G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):E689-96. PubMed ID: 19730201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic angular three-dimensional measurement of multisegmental thoracolumbar motion in vivo.
Gercek E; Hartmann F; Kuhn S; Degreif J; Rommens PM; Rudig L
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Oct; 33(21):2326-33. PubMed ID: 18827699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of a method to assess range of motion of the cervical spine using a tape measure.
Asha SE; Pryor R
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2013 Oct; 36(8):538-45. PubMed ID: 24029386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional movements of the lumbar spine facet joints and segmental movements: in vivo examinations of normal subjects with a new non-invasive method.
Svedmark P; Tullberg T; Noz ME; Maguire GQ; Zeleznik MP; Weidenhielm L; Nemeth G; Olivecrona H
Eur Spine J; 2012 Apr; 21(4):599-605. PubMed ID: 21881866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability and validity of the Microgate Gyko for measuring range of motion of the low back.
Hamersma DT; Hofste A; Rijken NHM; Roe Of Rohé M; Oosterveld FGJ; Soer R
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2020 Feb; 45():102091. PubMed ID: 31735439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of methods for measuring spinal motion in female patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Hresko MT; Mesiha M; Richards K; Zurakowski D
J Pediatr Orthop; 2006; 26(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 17065941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
