These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23797847)

  • 1. Comparison between various fracture risk assessment tools.
    Leslie WD; Lix LM
    Osteoporos Int; 2014 Jan; 25(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 23797847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.
    Beaudoin C; Moore L; Gagné M; Bessette L; Ste-Marie LG; Brown JP; Jean S
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Apr; 30(4):721-740. PubMed ID: 30877348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study.
    Dagan N; Cohen-Stavi C; Leventer-Roberts M; Balicer RD
    BMJ; 2017 Jan; 356():i6755. PubMed ID: 28104610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Worldwide Fracture Prediction.
    El-Hajj Fuleihan G; Chakhtoura M; Cauley JA; Chamoun N
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):397-424. PubMed ID: 28734709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Personalized fracture risk assessment: where are we at?
    Nguyen TV
    Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab; 2021 Jul; 16(4):191-200. PubMed ID: 33982611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognosis of fracture: evaluation of predictive accuracy of the FRAX algorithm and Garvan nomogram.
    Sandhu SK; Nguyen ND; Center JR; Pocock NA; Eisman JA; Nguyen TV
    Osteoporos Int; 2010 May; 21(5):863-71. PubMed ID: 19633880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How well do the FRAX (Australia) and Garvan calculators predict incident fractures? Data from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study.
    Holloway-Kew KL; Zhang Y; Betson AG; Anderson KB; Hans D; Hyde NK; Nicholson GC; Pocock NA; Kotowicz MA; Pasco JA
    Osteoporos Int; 2019 Oct; 30(10):2129-2139. PubMed ID: 31317250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Overview of Fracture Prediction Tools.
    Kanis JA; Harvey NC; Johansson H; Odén A; McCloskey EV; Leslie WD
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):444-450. PubMed ID: 28716500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. clinical risk factors for osteoporosis in Ireland and the UK: a comparison of FRAX and QFractureScores.
    Cummins NM; Poku EK; Towler MR; O'Driscoll OM; Ralston SH
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2011 Aug; 89(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 21647704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fracture Risk Assessment: From Population to Individual.
    Nguyen TV; Eisman JA
    J Clin Densitom; 2017; 20(3):368-378. PubMed ID: 28729045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Risk assessment tools to identify women with increased risk of osteoporotic fracture: complexity or simplicity? A systematic review.
    Rubin KH; Friis-Holmberg T; Hermann AP; Abrahamsen B; Brixen K
    J Bone Miner Res; 2013 Aug; 28(8):1701-17. PubMed ID: 23592255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of electronic and manual fracture risk assessment tools in screening elderly male US veterans at risk for osteoporosis.
    Williams ST; Lawrence PT; Miller KL; Crook JL; LaFleur J; Cannon GW; Nelson RE
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Nov; 28(11):3107-3111. PubMed ID: 28756457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fracture risk assessment without bone density measurement in routine clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Morin S; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 21850546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX® prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo Osteoporosis Risk in Men (FORMEN) Cohort Study.
    Iki M; Fujita Y; Tamaki J; Kouda K; Yura A; Sato Y; Moon JS; Winzenrieth R; Okamoto N; Kurumatani N
    Osteoporos Int; 2015 Jun; 26(6):1841-8. PubMed ID: 25752623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Importance of bone mineral density measurements in evaluating fragility bone fracture risk in Asian Indian men.
    Kuruvilla K; Kenny AM; Raisz LG; Kerstetter JE; Feinn RS; Rajan TV
    Osteoporos Int; 2011 Jan; 22(1):217-21. PubMed ID: 20445964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From fracture risk prediction to evaluating fracture patterns: recent advances in the epidemiology of osteoporosis.
    Wright NC; Saag KG
    Curr Rheumatol Rep; 2012 Jun; 14(3):205-11. PubMed ID: 22453874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High fracture probability with FRAX usually indicates densitometric osteoporosis: implications for clinical practice.
    Leslie WD; Majumdar SR; Lix LM; Johansson H; Oden A; McCloskey E; Kanis JA;
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jan; 23(1):391-7. PubMed ID: 21365460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of individual fracture risk: FRAX and beyond.
    van den Bergh JP; van Geel TA; Lems WF; Geusens PP
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2010 Sep; 8(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 20563901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fracture risk prediction using FRAX in patients following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
    Pundole X; Murphy WA; Ebede CC; Karim E; Manocha S; Don-Pedro D; Rondon G; Leung CH; Liu S; Du XL; Champlin RE; Lu H
    Arch Osteoporos; 2018 Apr; 13(1):38. PubMed ID: 29619576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fracture prediction tools in diabetes.
    Agarwal A; Leslie WD
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2022 Aug; 29(4):326-332. PubMed ID: 35749735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.