These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2379964)

  • 1. Efficiency of ear protectors in laboratory and real life tests.
    Pawlas K; Grzesik J
    Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1990; 62(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 2379964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The difference in protection efficiency between earplugs and earmuffs. An investigation performed at a workplace.
    Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Ivarsson A; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol; 1980; 9(4):215-21. PubMed ID: 7466283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Effectiveness of ear protective devices].
    Taniewski M; Zaborski L; Szczepański C; Nitka J
    Med Pr; 1978; 29(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 723611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The acoustical attenuation of some combinations of earplugs and earmuffs.
    Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD; Custard G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):299-309. PubMed ID: 3426030
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The performance of circumaural hearing protectors by dosimetry.
    Chung DY; Hardie R; Gannon RP
    J Occup Med; 1983 Sep; 25(9):679-82. PubMed ID: 6631567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Differences in efficiency of earplugs and earmuffs measured as hearing impairments from two workshops.
    Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1980 Aug; (Suppl 12):194-9. PubMed ID: 6939088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of hearing protection devices performance in the workplace during full-shift working operations.
    Nélisse H; Gaudreau MA; Boutin J; Voix J; Laville F
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2012 Mar; 56(2):221-32. PubMed ID: 22009918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A study of the real-world noise attenuation of the current hearing protection devices in typical workplaces using Field Microphone in Real Ear method.
    Aliabadi M; Biabani A; Golmohammadi R; Farhadian M
    Work; 2018; 60(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 29865097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of industrial use on the acoustical performance of some earmuffs.
    Rawlinson RD; Wheeler PD
    Ann Occup Hyg; 1987; 31(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 3426029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Field investigations of noise reduction afforded by insert-type hearing protectors.
    Lempert BL; Edwards RG
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1983 Dec; 44(12):894-902. PubMed ID: 6660189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise attenuation of hearing protectors against heavy weapon noise.
    Pääkkönen R; Lehtomäki K; Savolainen S; Myllyniemi J; Hämäläinen E
    Mil Med; 2000 Sep; 165(9):678-82. PubMed ID: 11011540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Attenuation efficiency of hearing protectors for workers exposed to noise].
    Murakami M; Hirota Y; Ohwada H; Kanemitsu K
    Sangyo Igaku; 1984 Mar; 26(2):178-9. PubMed ID: 6503014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The otolaryngologist and hearing protectors.
    Alberti PW; Riko K
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1984 Nov; 17(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 6514358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.
    Thunder TD; Lankford JE
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1979 Dec; 40(12):1023-9. PubMed ID: 539542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Objective determinations of individual sound protectors (author's transl)].
    Partsch CJ; Hülse M
    HNO; 1977 Nov; 25(11):386-8. PubMed ID: 924817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Methods of measuring and rating hearing protector performance.
    Lotito F
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Oct; 37(10):590-5. PubMed ID: 983949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic Evaluation of the Relationship between Physical and Psychoacoustical Measurements of Hearing Protectors' Attenuation.
    Nélisse H; Le Cocq C; Boutin J; Laville F; Voix J
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(12):829-44. PubMed ID: 26023884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection of Level-Dependent Hearing Protectors for Use in An Indoor Shooting Range.
    Mlynski R; Kozlowski E
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 31252535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of hearing protective devices.
    Gosztonyi RE
    J Occup Med; 1975 Sep; 17(9):569-80. PubMed ID: 1165499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation of sound level conversion as a means of rating ear protector performance.
    Waugh R
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1976 Apr; 37(4):239-45. PubMed ID: 1274842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.