These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2379964)

  • 21. Symphony orchestra musicians' use of hearing protection and attenuation of custom-made hearing protectors as measured with two different real-ear attenuation at threshold methods.
    Huttunen KH; Sivonen VP; Poykko VT
    Noise Health; 2011; 13(51):176-88. PubMed ID: 21368443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effectiveness of hearing protectors in practice.
    Alberti PW; Riko K; Abel SM; Kristensen R
    J Otolaryngol; 1979 Aug; 8(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 513182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aspects on personal noise protection.
    Axelsson K; Axelsson A; Jonsson A
    Scand Audiol; 1978; 7(4):247-53. PubMed ID: 756091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of protector-noise interaction on the accuracy of the NRR estimate of hearing protector attenuation.
    Cluff GL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Apr; 47(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 3706147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The use of acoustical test fixtures for the measurement of hearing protector attenuation. Part II: Modeling the external ear, simulating bone conduction, and comparing test fixture and real-ear data.
    Schroeter J; Poesselt C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Aug; 80(2):505-27. PubMed ID: 3745683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Attenuation of earmuffs used simultaneously with respiratory protective devices].
    Kozłowski E; Młyński R
    Med Pr; 2017 May; 68(3):349-361. PubMed ID: 28512363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Performance of different types of hearing protectors undergoing high-level impulse noise.
    Buck K
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2009; 15(2):227-40. PubMed ID: 19534855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The typical noise: first step in the development of a short procedure for estimating performance of hearing protectors.
    Tobias JV; Johnson DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jan; 63(1):207-10. PubMed ID: 632413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Protecting hearing in a military environment.
    Forrest MR
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 16():7-12. PubMed ID: 6962514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Audiometric studies versus predictions of drastic deteriorations of hearing protectors' noise attenuation due to reduced wearing time: Misjudgments by standards based on the energy-equivalence principle.
    Strasser H; Müller O; Irle H
    Work; 2015; 51(4):757-70. PubMed ID: 26409946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of hearing protection on narrowband signal detection in industrial noise.
    Abel SM; Kunov H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alberti PW
    J Otolaryngol; 1983 Apr; 12(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 6864854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A psychophysical evaluation of the dependence of hearing protector attenuation on noise level.
    Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jan; 73(1):297-311. PubMed ID: 6826899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Ear protective plugs].
    Sułkowski W; Kowalska S; Kieruczenko J; Krezelewska E; Sławiński Z; Wośko S
    Med Pr; 1979; 30(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 481203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Pure tone audiometry with and without specific ear protectors.
    Rodrigues de Faria CA; Suzuki FA
    Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2008; 74(3):417-22. PubMed ID: 18661017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Alternative field methods for measuring hearing protector performance.
    Franks JR; Murphy WJ; Harris DA; Johnson JL; Shaw PB
    AIHA J (Fairfax, Va); 2003; 64(4):501-9. PubMed ID: 12908866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Real-ear attenuation of earmuffs in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired individuals.
    Suter AH; Lempert BL; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 May; 87(5):2114-7. PubMed ID: 2348018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hearing protector performance--an update.
    Michael PL; Bienvenue GR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1980 Aug; 41(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 7405821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Determining attenuation of impulse noise with an electrical equivalent of a hearing protection device.
    Młyński R; Kozłowski E
    Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2013; 19(1):127-41. PubMed ID: 23498707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Polymeric hearing protectors in sport shooting].
    Lwow F; Szmigiero L
    Polim Med; 2007; 37(3):21-9. PubMed ID: 18251202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is it necessary to measure hearing protector attenuation at 3.15 and 6.3 kHz?
    Berger EH; Rowland LD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1590-4. PubMed ID: 2708676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.