197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23800533)
1. Within-center matching performed better when using propensity score matching to analyze multicenter survival data: empirical and Monte Carlo studies.
Gayat E; Thabut G; Christie JD; Mebazaa A; Mary JY; Porcher R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):1029-37. PubMed ID: 23800533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Propensity score applied to survival data analysis through proportional hazards models: a Monte Carlo study.
Gayat E; Resche-Rigon M; Mary JY; Porcher R
Pharm Stat; 2012; 11(3):222-9. PubMed ID: 22411785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oversampling and replacement strategies in propensity score matching: a critical review focused on small sample size in clinical settings.
Bottigliengo D; Baldi I; Lanera C; Lorenzoni G; Bejko J; Bottio T; Tarzia V; Carrozzini M; Gerosa G; Berchialla P; Gregori D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Nov; 21(1):256. PubMed ID: 34809559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of the ability of double-robust estimators to correct bias in propensity score matching analysis. A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Nguyen TL; Collins GS; Spence J; Devereaux PJ; Daurès JP; Landais P; Le Manach Y
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1513-1519. PubMed ID: 28984050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propensity score matching with clustered data. An application to the estimation of the impact of caesarean section on the Apgar score.
Arpino B; Cannas M
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):2074-91. PubMed ID: 26833893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the use of bootstrapping in cohort studies conducted with 1:1 propensity score matching-A plasmode simulation study.
Desai RJ; Wyss R; Abdia Y; Toh S; Johnson M; Lee H; Karami S; Major JM; Nguyen M; Wang SV; Franklin JM; Gagne JJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2019 Jun; 28(6):879-886. PubMed ID: 31020732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The performance of inverse probability of treatment weighting and full matching on the propensity score in the presence of model misspecification when estimating the effect of treatment on survival outcomes.
Austin PC; Stuart EA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1654-1670. PubMed ID: 25934643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new weighted balance measure helped to select the variables to be included in a propensity score model.
Caruana E; Chevret S; Resche-Rigon M; Pirracchio R
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Dec; 68(12):1415-22.e2. PubMed ID: 26050059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios in case of small sample size.
Pirracchio R; Resche-Rigon M; Chevret S
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 May; 12():70. PubMed ID: 22646911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study.
Leyrat C; Caille A; Donner A; Giraudeau B
Stat Med; 2013 Aug; 32(19):3357-72. PubMed ID: 23553813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic matching for time-dependent treatments: a longitudinal extension and simulation study.
Weymann D; Chan B; Regier DA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Aug; 23(1):181. PubMed ID: 37559105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of the performance of different methods for propensity score matched subgroup analyses and a summary of their application in peer-reviewed research studies.
Wang SV; He M; Jin Y; Wyss R; Shin H; Ma Y; Keeton S; Fireman B; Karami S; Major JM; Schneeweiss S; Gagne JJ
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Dec; 26(12):1507-1512. PubMed ID: 28984001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Double propensity-score adjustment: A solution to design bias or bias due to incomplete matching.
Austin PC
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):201-222. PubMed ID: 25038071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Propensity score balance measures in pharmacoepidemiology: a simulation study.
Ali MS; Groenwold RH; Pestman WR; Belitser SV; Roes KC; Hoes AW; de Boer A; Klungel OH
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2014 Aug; 23(8):802-11. PubMed ID: 24478163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):734-53. PubMed ID: 16708349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Do Propensity Score Methods Measure Up in the Presence of Measurement Error? A Monte Carlo Study.
Rodríguez De Gil P; Bellara AP; Lanehart RE; Lee RS; Kim ES; Kromrey JD
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):520-32. PubMed ID: 26610250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Evaluation of Weighting Methods Based on Propensity Scores to Reduce Selection Bias in Multilevel Observational Studies.
Leite WL; Jimenez F; Kaya Y; Stapleton LM; MacInnes JW; Sandbach R
Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(3):265-84. PubMed ID: 26610029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Some methods of propensity-score matching had superior performance to others: results of an empirical investigation and Monte Carlo simulations.
Austin PC
Biom J; 2009 Feb; 51(1):171-84. PubMed ID: 19197955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Matching by propensity score in cohort studies with three treatment groups.
Rassen JA; Shelat AA; Franklin JM; Glynn RJ; Solomon DH; Schneeweiss S
Epidemiology; 2013 May; 24(3):401-9. PubMed ID: 23532053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propensity-score matching with competing risks in survival analysis.
Austin PC; Fine JP
Stat Med; 2019 Feb; 38(5):751-777. PubMed ID: 30347461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
