279 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23801421)
1. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jens S; Koelemay MJ; Reekers JA; Bipat S
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3104-14. PubMed ID: 23801421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of duplex ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomography angiography for the diagnosis and assessment of symptomatic, lower limb peripheral arterial disease.
Collins R; Cranny G; Burch J; Aguiar-Ibáñez R; Craig D; Wright K; Berry E; Gough M; Kleijnen J; Westwood M
Health Technol Assess; 2007 May; 11(20):iii-iv, xi-xiii, 1-184. PubMed ID: 17462170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Quiescent-Interval Single-Shot Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia Undergoing Digital Subtraction Angiography: Comparison With Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography With Calf Compression at 3.0 Tesla.
Wei LM; Zhu YQ; Zhang PL; Lu HT; Zhao JG
J Endovasc Ther; 2019 Feb; 26(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 30580695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, colour duplex and digital subtraction angiography of the lower limb arteries from the aorta to the tibio-peroneal trunk in patients with intermittent claudication.
Gjønnaess E; Morken B; Sandbaek G; Stranden E; Slagsvold CE; Jørgensen JJ; Nylaende M; Abdelnoor M; Dullerud R
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 Jan; 31(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16269254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography in critical limb ischemia: performance of quiescent-interval single-shot (QISS) and TSE-based subtraction techniques.
Altaha MA; Jaskolka JD; Tan K; Rick M; Schmitt P; Menezes RJ; Wintersperger BJ
Eur Radiol; 2017 Mar; 27(3):1218-1226. PubMed ID: 27352087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging in critical limb ischemia: an overview.
Iglesias J; Peña C
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Sep; 17(3):147-54. PubMed ID: 25241315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Grading of carotid artery stenosis in the presence of extensive calcifications: dual-energy CT angiography in comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Korn A; Bender B; Brodoefel H; Hauser TK; Danz S; Ernemann U; Thomas C
Clin Neuroradiol; 2015 Mar; 25(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 24343701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography in peripheral arterial disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Met R; Bipat S; Legemate DA; Reekers JA; Koelemay MJ
JAMA; 2009 Jan; 301(4):415-24. PubMed ID: 19176443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography and digital subtraction angiography in patients with chronic critical ischemia and tissue loss.
Leiner T; Kessels AG; Schurink GW; Kitslaar PJ; de Haan MW; Tordoir JH; van Engelshoven JM
Invest Radiol; 2004 Jul; 39(7):435-44. PubMed ID: 15194915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3 T contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of the intracranial arteries: comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and multislice computed tomography angiography.
Villablanca JP; Nael K; Habibi R; Nael A; Laub G; Finn JP
Invest Radiol; 2006 Nov; 41(11):799-805. PubMed ID: 17035870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Critical lower-limb ischemia: the diagnostic performance of dual-phase injection MR angiography (including high-resolution distal imaging) compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Owen AR; Robertson IR; Annamalai G; Roditi GH; Edwards RD; Murray LS; Moss JG
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2009 Feb; 20(2):165-72. PubMed ID: 19081736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography for evaluation of peripheral arterial occlusive disease: results of a phase III multicenter trial.
Bui BT; Miller S; Mildenberger P; Sam A; Sheng R;
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1402-10. PubMed ID: 20512893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The diagnostic value of non-contrast enhanced quiescent interval single shot (QISS) magnetic resonance angiography at 3T for lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, in comparison to CT angiography.
Wu G; Yang J; Zhang T; Morelli JN; Giri S; Li X; Tang W
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2016 Oct; 18(1):71. PubMed ID: 27760564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic accuracy of computer tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography in the stenosis detection of autologuous hemodialysis access: a meta-analysis.
Li B; Li Q; Chen C; Guan Y; Liu S
PLoS One; 2013; 8(10):e78409. PubMed ID: 24194928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonenhanced ECG-gated quiescent-interval single shot MRA: image quality and stenosis assessment at 3 tesla compared with contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography.
Hansmann J; Morelli JN; Michaely HJ; Riester T; Budjan J; Schoenberg SO; Attenberger UI
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 39(6):1486-93. PubMed ID: 24338813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An international multicenter comparison of time-SLIP unenhanced MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT angiography for assessing renal artery stenosis: the renal artery contrast-free trial.
Albert TS; Akahane M; Parienty I; Yellin N; Catalá V; Alomar X; Prot A; Tomizawa N; Xue H; Katabathina VS; Lopera JE; Jin Z
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Jan; 204(1):182-8. PubMed ID: 25539255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
