These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23801969)
1. Learning to ignore salient color distractors during serial search: evidence for experience-dependent attention allocation strategies. Biggs AT; Gibson BS Front Psychol; 2013; 4():326. PubMed ID: 23801969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Competition between color salience and perceptual load during visual selection can be biased by top-down set. Biggs AT; Gibson BS Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Jan; 72(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 20045879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual salience can co-exist with dilution during visual selection. Biggs AT; Gibson BS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 23937214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dissociating compatibility effects and distractor costs in the additional singleton paradigm. Folk CL Front Psychol; 2013; 4():434. PubMed ID: 23882241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Selective target processing: perceptual load or distractor salience? Eltiti S; Wallace D; Fox E Percept Psychophys; 2005 Jul; 67(5):876-85. PubMed ID: 16334059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low level perceptual, not attentional, processes modulate distractor interference in high perceptual load displays: evidence from neglect/extinction. Mevorach C; Tsal Y; Humphreys GW Front Psychol; 2014 Jan; 4():966. PubMed ID: 24454297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The inability to ignore auditory distractors as a function of visual task perceptual load. Tellinghuisen DJ; Nowak EJ Percept Psychophys; 2003 Jul; 65(5):817-28. PubMed ID: 12956588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Benoni H; Tsal Y Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(13):1292-8. PubMed ID: 20430048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dilution: atheoretical burden or just load? A reply to Tsal and Benoni (2010). Lavie N; Torralbo A J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1657-64; discussion 1665-8. PubMed ID: 21133554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency. Kumada T Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Distractor's salience does not determine feature suppression: A commentary on Wang and Theeuwes (2020). Ramgir A; Lamy D J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2023 Jun; 49(6):852-861. PubMed ID: 37276124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation. Gong M; Jia K; Li S J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional selection: A salience-based competition for representation. Mounts JR Percept Psychophys; 2005 Oct; 67(7):1190-8. PubMed ID: 16502841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Opening the window: Size of the attentional window dominates perceptual load and familiarity in visual selection. Biggs AT; Gibson BS J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Nov; 44(11):1780-1798. PubMed ID: 30247049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Tracking target and distractor processing in fixed-feature visual search: evidence from human electrophysiology. Jannati A; Gaspar JM; McDonald JJ J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Dec; 39(6):1713-30. PubMed ID: 23527999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches. Lawrence RK; Pratt J Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jan; 84(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 34907511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]