440 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23802636)
1. Frequency of restoration replacement in posterior teeth for U.S. Navy and Marine Corps personnel.
Laccabue M; Ahlf RL; Simecek JW
Oper Dent; 2014; 39(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 23802636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An evaluation of replacement rates for posterior resin-based composite and amalgam restorations in U.S. Navy and marine corps recruits.
Simecek JW; Diefenderfer KE; Cohen ME
J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):200-9; quiz 249. PubMed ID: 19188417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The frequency of replacement of dental restorations may vary based on a number of variables, including type of material, size of the restoration, and caries risk of the patient.
Roumanas ED
J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 10(1):23-4. PubMed ID: 20230960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Placement and replacement rates of amalgam and composite restorations on posterior teeth in a military population.
Owen BD; Guevara PH; Greenwood W
US Army Med Dep J; 2017; (2-17):88-94. PubMed ID: 28853125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twelve-year survival of 2-surface composite resin and amalgam premolar restorations placed by dental students.
Naghipur S; Pesun I; Nowakowski A; Kim A
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Sep; 116(3):336-9. PubMed ID: 27086110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reasons for placement and replacement of dental restorations in the United States Navy Dental Corps.
York AK; Arthur JS
Oper Dent; 1993; 18(5):203-8. PubMed ID: 8152990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent or adult posterior teeth.
Rasines Alcaraz MG; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Mar; (3):CD005620. PubMed ID: 24683067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Longevity of direct restorations in stress-bearing posterior cavities: a retrospective study.
Rho YJ; Namgung C; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(6):572-82. PubMed ID: 23550914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Black or white--Which choice for the molars? Part 2. Which does one choose for the restoration of posterior teeth: amalgam or composite?].
De Moor R; Delmé K
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2008; 63(4):135-46. PubMed ID: 19227687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct composite resin fillings versus amalgam fillings for permanent posterior teeth.
Worthington HV; Khangura S; Seal K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Veitz-Keenan A; Sahrmann P; Schmidlin PR; Davis D; Iheozor-Ejiofor Z; Rasines Alcaraz MG
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2021 Aug; 8(8):CD005620. PubMed ID: 34387873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Longevity of repaired restorations: a practice based study.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Loomans BA; Huysmans MC
J Dent; 2012 Oct; 40(10):829-35. PubMed ID: 22771415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skin color affect the replacement of amalgam for composite in posterior restorations: a birth-cohort study.
Chisini LA; Collares K; Bastos JLD; Peres KG; Peres MA; Horta BL; Demarco FF; Correa MB
Braz Oral Res; 2019 Jul; 33():e54. PubMed ID: 31365703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial.
Soncini JA; Maserejian NN; Trachtenberg F; Tavares M; Hayes C
J Am Dent Assoc; 2007 Jun; 138(6):763-72. PubMed ID: 17545265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations.
Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA
Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study.
Casagrande L; Laske M; Bronkhorst EM; Huysmans MCDNJM; Opdam NJM
J Dent; 2017 Sep; 64():30-36. PubMed ID: 28602850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors relating to usage patterns of amalgam and resin composite for posterior restorations--a prospective analysis.
Khalaf ME; Alomari QD; Omar R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):785-92. PubMed ID: 24769386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Longevity of posterior resin composite restorations in permanent teeth in Public Dental Health Service: a prospective 8 years follow up.
Pallesen U; van Dijken JW; Halken J; Hallonsten AL; Höigaard R
J Dent; 2013 Apr; 41(4):297-306. PubMed ID: 23228499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Amalgam or composite resin? Factors influencing the choice of restorative material.
Correa MB; Peres MA; Peres KG; Horta BL; Barros AD; Demarco FF
J Dent; 2012 Sep; 40(9):703-10. PubMed ID: 22546263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longevity of 2- and 3-surface restorations in posterior teeth of 25- to 30-year-olds attending Public Dental Service-A 13-year observation.
Palotie U; Eronen AK; Vehkalahti K; Vehkalahti MM
J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():13-17. PubMed ID: 28529175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical longevity of extensive direct resin composite restorations after amalgam replacement with a mean follow-up of 15 years.
Hofsteenge JW; Scholtanus JD; Özcan M; Nolte IM; Cune MS; Gresnigt MMM
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104409. PubMed ID: 36623686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
