179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23803309)
1. Comparison of cardiac output derived from FloTrac™/Vigileo™ and impedance cardiography during major abdominal surgery.
Kim JY; Kim BR; Lee KH; Kim KW; Kim JH; Lee SI; Kim KT; Choe WJ; Park JS; Kim JW
J Int Med Res; 2013 Aug; 41(4):1342-9. PubMed ID: 23803309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cardiac output determination from endotracheally measured impedance cardiography: clinical evaluation of endotracheal cardiac output monitor.
Maus TM; Reber B; Banks DA; Berry A; Guerrero E; Manecke GR
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2011 Oct; 25(5):770-5. PubMed ID: 21354828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of impedance cardiography for evaluating trends in cardiac output: a comparison with oesophageal Doppler.
Lorne E; Mahjoub Y; Diouf M; Sleghem J; Buchalet C; Guinot PG; Petiot S; Kessavane A; Dehedin B; Dupont H
Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):596-602. PubMed ID: 24871872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impedance cardiography: a potential monitor for hemodialysis.
Wynne JL; Ovadje LO; Akridge CM; Sheppard SW; Vogel RL; Van de Water JM
J Surg Res; 2006 Jun; 133(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 16631198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impedance cardiography for monitoring changes in cardiac output.
Parashar R; Bajpai M; Goyal M; Singh S; Tiwari S; Narayan VS
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 23387239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy and Efficacy of Impedance Cardiography as a Non-Invasive Cardiac Function Monitor.
Kim GE; Kim SY; Kim SJ; Yun SY; Jung HH; Kang YS; Koo BN
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Aug; 60(8):735-741. PubMed ID: 31347328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac index in healthy volunteers: a comparison between thoracic impedance cardiography and Doppler echocardiography.
Fellahi JL; Caille V; Charron C; Deschamps-Berger PH; Vieillard-Baron A
Anesth Analg; 2009 May; 108(5):1553-9. PubMed ID: 19372335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac output measurement after coronary artery bypass grafting using bolus thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and whole-body impedance cardiography.
Kaukinen S; Kööbi T; Bi Y; Turjanmaa VM
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2003 Apr; 17(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 12698402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Continuous non-invasive measurement of stroke volume and cardiac index in infants and children: comparison of Impedance Cardiography NICaS® vs CardioQ® method.
Beck R; Milella L; Labellarte C
Clin Ter; 2018; 169(3):e110-e113. PubMed ID: 29938742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cardiac output monitoring by impedance cardiography in cardiac surgery].
Shimizu H; Seki S; Mizuguchi A; Tsuchida H; Watanabe H; Namiki A
Masui; 1990 Apr; 39(4):508-12. PubMed ID: 2362347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Poor accuracy of noninvasive cardiac output monitoring using bioimpedance cardiography [PhysioFlow(R)] compared to magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients.
Taylor K; Manlhiot C; McCrindle B; Grosse-Wortmann L; Holtby H
Anesth Analg; 2012 Apr; 114(4):771-5. PubMed ID: 22314693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inaccuracy of the FloTrac/Vigileo™ system in patients with low cardiac index.
Maeda T; Yoshitani K; Inatomi Y; Ohnishi Y
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1521-6. PubMed ID: 25306519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Measurements of cardiac output during constant exercises: comparison of two non-invasive techniques.
Tordi N; Mourot L; Matusheski B; Hughson RL
Int J Sports Med; 2004 Feb; 25(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 14986199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of cardiac output measurement with the LiDCO™ pulse contour system in patients with impaired left ventricular function after cardiac surgery.
Mora B; Ince I; Birkenberg B; Skhirtladze K; Pernicka E; Ankersmit HJ; Dworschak M
Anaesthesia; 2011 Aug; 66(8):675-81. PubMed ID: 21564044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Agreement between preload reserve measured by impedance cardiography and echocardiography during pregnancy.
Liang H; Vårtun Å; Acharya G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Jul; 298(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 29623416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Perioperative hemodynamic study of patients undergoing abdominal surgery using pulse dye densitometry.
Nishioka M; Ishikawa M; Hanaki N; Kashiwagi Y; Miki H; Miyake H; Tashiro S
Hepatogastroenterology; 2006; 53(72):874-8. PubMed ID: 17153444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of noninvasive continuous arterial waveform analysis (Nexfin) with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for monitoring of cardiac output.
van der Spoel AG; Voogel AJ; Folkers A; Boer C; Bouwman RA
J Clin Anesth; 2012 Jun; 24(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 22608585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transthoracic impedance cardiography: a noninvasive method of hemodynamic assessment.
Bayram M; Yancy CW
Heart Fail Clin; 2009 Apr; 5(2):161-8. PubMed ID: 19249685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impedance cardiography: the next vital sign technology?
Van De Water JM; Miller TW; Vogel RL; Mount BE; Dalton ML
Chest; 2003 Jun; 123(6):2028-33. PubMed ID: 12796185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
