109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23803670)
1. Use of CAP88 at Department of Energy sites.
Snyder S; Vázquez G; Hay T
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S164-8. PubMed ID: 23803670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A best fit approach to estimating multiple diffuse source terms using ambient air monitoring data and an air dispersion model.
MacQueen D; Bertoldo N; Wegrecki A
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S140-8. PubMed ID: 23803667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's CAP88 PC Versions 3.0 and 4.0.
Jannik T; Farfan EB; Dixon K; Newton J; Sailors C; Johnson L; Moore K; Stahman R
Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 26102326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of CAP88 PC Ver. 3.0 and MAXDOSE dose assessment models involving co-located stack releases at the Savannah River site.
Farfán E; Jannik GT; Lee P; Powell A
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S158-63. PubMed ID: 23803669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of radionuclide databases in CAP88 mainframe version 1.0 and Windows-based version 3.0.
LaBone ED; Farfán EB; Lee PL; Jannik GT; Donnelly EH; Foley TQ
Health Phys; 2009 Sep; 97(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 19667807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation test for CAP88 predictions of tritium dispersion at Los Alamos National Laboratory.
Michelotti E; Green A; Whicker J; Eisele W; Fuehne D; McNaughton M
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S176-81. PubMed ID: 23803672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Six methods to assess potential radioactive air emissions from a stack.
Barnett JM; Davis WE
Health Phys; 1996 Nov; 71(5):773-8. PubMed ID: 8887527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of dose results from the Clean Air Act Assessment Package-1988, personal computer (CAP88-PC), version 3 to previous versions.
Rhoads K; Snyder S; Staven L
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S125-39. PubMed ID: 23803666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Addressing nuclides not in the CAP88-PC Version-3 library.
McNaughton M; Brock B; Eisele W; Fuehne D; Green A; Whicker J
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S182-8. PubMed ID: 23803673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Basis and implications of the CAP88 age-specific dose coefficients.
Leggett R; Scofield P; Eckerman K
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S149-57. PubMed ID: 23803668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CAP88-PC Version 4, an updated radionuclide NESHAPS model.
Wood R; Stuenkel D; Rosnick R
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S169-75. PubMed ID: 23803671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Current Center of Site Annual Neshap Dose Modeling at the Savannah River Site with Other Assessment Methods.
Minter KM; Jannik GT; Stagich BH; Dixon KL; Newton JR
Health Phys; 2018 Apr; 114(4):408-413. PubMed ID: 29481531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose Comparisons for a Site-specific Representative Person Using the Age-dependent Dose Coefficients in CAP88-PC Version 4.
Stagich BH; Moore KR; Newton JR; Dixon KL; Jannik GT
Health Phys; 2017 Apr; 112(4):338-342. PubMed ID: 28234692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The United States Department of Energy's Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnerships program: a collaborative approach to carbon management.
Litynski JT; Klara SM; McIlvried HG; Srivastava RD
Environ Int; 2006 Jan; 32(1):128-44. PubMed ID: 16054694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Methods to Account for CAP-88 PC-Omitted Nuclides in Radioactive Air Emissions From DOE Facilities.
Harshman A; Scofield P
Health Phys; 2023 Apr; 124(4):332-341. PubMed ID: 36729377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An attempt for modeling the atmospheric transport of 3H around Kakrapar Atomic Power Station.
Patra AK; Nankar DP; Joshi CP; Venkataraman S; Sundar D; Hegde AG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 130(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 18664562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of radiological versus chemical toxicity limits for varying enrichments of uranium for Department of Energy facilities.
O'Connell P; Rabovsky J; Foulke J
Health Phys; 2010 Feb; 98 Suppl 1():S17-21. PubMed ID: 20065666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation and measurements of radioactive air emission and off-site doses at SLAC.
Chan I; Liu J; Tran H
Health Phys; 2013 Aug; 105(2 Suppl 2):S115-8. PubMed ID: 23803664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of airflow patterns following procedures established by NUREG-1400.
Fritz BG; Khan F; Mendoza DP
Health Phys; 2006 Aug; 91(2 Suppl):S18-23. PubMed ID: 16823267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of results for the University of Missouri Research Reactor radiological airborne release assessments obtained from PC-based computer programs.
Rong X; Kutikkad K; Langhorst SM
Health Phys; 1995 Jun; 68(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 7759266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
