These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23804092)

  • 1. The brain dynamics of rapid perceptual adaptation to adverse listening conditions.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    J Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 33(26):10688-97. PubMed ID: 23804092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Auditory skills and brain morphology predict individual differences in adaptation to degraded speech.
    Erb J; Henry MJ; Eisner F; Obleser J
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2154-64. PubMed ID: 22609577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Left thalamo-cortical network implicated in successful speech separation and identification.
    Alain C; Reinke K; McDonald KL; Chau W; Tam F; Pacurar A; Graham S
    Neuroimage; 2005 Jun; 26(2):592-9. PubMed ID: 15907316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-line plasticity in spoken sentence comprehension: Adapting to time-compressed speech.
    Adank P; Devlin JT
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):1124-32. PubMed ID: 19632341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic richness modulates the neural networks supporting intelligible speech processing.
    Lee YS; Min NE; Wingfield A; Grossman M; Peelle JE
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():108-117. PubMed ID: 26723103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults' speech comprehension.
    Erb J; Obleser J
    Front Syst Neurosci; 2013; 7():116. PubMed ID: 24399939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception.
    Peng ZE; Wang LM
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for rapid auditory perception as the foundation of speech processing: a sparse temporal sampling fMRI study.
    Zaehle T; Wüstenberg T; Meyer M; Jäncke L
    Eur J Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 20(9):2447-56. PubMed ID: 15525285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke.
    Brownsett SL; Warren JE; Geranmayeh F; Woodhead Z; Leech R; Wise RJ
    Brain; 2014 Jan; 137(Pt 1):242-54. PubMed ID: 24163248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. L2 speech perception in noise: An fMRI study of advanced Spanish learners.
    Rammell CS; Cheng H; Pisoni DB; Newman SD
    Brain Res; 2019 Oct; 1720():146316. PubMed ID: 31278936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The eye as a window to the listening brain: neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load.
    Zekveld AA; Heslenfeld DJ; Johnsrude IS; Versfeld NJ; Kramer SE
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 101():76-86. PubMed ID: 24999040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech comprehension aided by multiple modalities: behavioural and neural interactions.
    McGettigan C; Faulkner A; Altarelli I; Obleser J; Baverstock H; Scott SK
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Apr; 50(5):762-76. PubMed ID: 22266262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of five fMRI protocols for mapping speech comprehension systems.
    Binder JR; Swanson SJ; Hammeke TA; Sabsevitz DS
    Epilepsia; 2008 Dec; 49(12):1980-97. PubMed ID: 18513352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for Cerebellar Contributions to Adaptive Plasticity in Speech Perception.
    Guediche S; Holt LL; Laurent P; Lim SJ; Fiez JA
    Cereb Cortex; 2015 Jul; 25(7):1867-77. PubMed ID: 24451660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An fMRI study investigating effects of conceptually related sentences on the perception of degraded speech.
    Guediche S; Reilly M; Santiago C; Laurent P; Blumstein SE
    Cortex; 2016 Jun; 79():57-74. PubMed ID: 27100909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semantic and acoustic analysis of speech by functional networks with distinct time scales.
    Deng S; Srinivasan R
    Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1346():132-44. PubMed ID: 20580635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brain activity underlying the recovery of meaning from degraded speech: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.
    Wijayasiri P; Hartley DEH; Wiggins IM
    Hear Res; 2017 Aug; 351():55-67. PubMed ID: 28571617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integration of iconic gestures and speech in left superior temporal areas boosts speech comprehension under adverse listening conditions.
    Holle H; Obleser J; Rueschemeyer SA; Gunter TC
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):875-84. PubMed ID: 19733670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Song and speech: brain regions involved with perception and covert production.
    Callan DE; Tsytsarev V; Hanakawa T; Callan AM; Katsuhara M; Fukuyama H; Turner R
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(3):1327-42. PubMed ID: 16546406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Native and non-native listeners show similar yet distinct oscillatory dynamics when using gestures to access speech in noise.
    Drijvers L; van der Plas M; Özyürek A; Jensen O
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jul; 194():55-67. PubMed ID: 30905837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.