480 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23804344)
1. Fetal size charts for a population from Cali, Colombia: sonographic measurements of biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Jul; 32(7):1215-25. PubMed ID: 23804344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.
Konje JC; Abrams KR; Bell SC; Taylor DJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 19(6):592-7. PubMed ID: 12047540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations.
Zhang Y; Meng H; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Ouyang Y; Li S; Chen Q; Wu Q; Li R; Ru T; Cai A; Chen X; Yang T; Chen P; Xie H; Lu H; Dai Q; Dong F; Yang M; Yang X; Lu J; Tian J; Sun K; Li H;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Femur-sparing pattern of abnormal fetal growth in pregnant women from New York City after maternal Zika virus infection.
Walker CL; Merriam AA; Ohuma EO; Dighe MK; Gale M; Rajagopal L; Papageorghiou AT; Gyamfi-Bannerman C; Adams Waldorf KM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 219(2):187.e1-187.e20. PubMed ID: 29738748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reference charts of fetal biometric parameters in 31,476 Brazilian singleton pregnancies.
Araujo Júnior E; Martins Santana EF; Martins WP; Júnior JE; Ruano R; Pires CR; Filho SM
J Ultrasound Med; 2014 Jul; 33(7):1185-91. PubMed ID: 24958405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Charts of fetal size: 2. Head measurements.
Chitty LS; Altman DG; Henderson A; Campbell S
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1994 Jan; 101(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 8297866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultrasonographic measurements of fetal femur length and biparietal diameter in an Israeli population.
Shohat T; Romano-Zelekha O;
Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Mar; 3(3):166-8. PubMed ID: 11303371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Discrepancy of ultrasound biometric parameters of the head (HC--head circumference, BPD--biparietal diameter) and femur length in relation to sex of the fetus and duration of pregnancy].
L'ubuský M; Mícková I; Procházka M; Dzvincuk P; Malá K; Cízek L; Janout V
Ceska Gynekol; 2006 May; 71(3):169-72. PubMed ID: 16768041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Customized Fetal Growth Charts for Parents' Characteristics, Race, and Parity by Quantile Regression Analysis: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Italian Study.
Ghi T; Cariello L; Rizzo L; Ferrazzi E; Periti E; Prefumo F; Stampalija T; Viora E; Verrotti C; Rizzo G;
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jan; 35(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 26643757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biometry 2000. Fetal growth charts by the French College of fetal ultrasonography and the Inserm U 155].
Créquat J; Duyme M; Brodaty G
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Jun; 28(6):435-45. PubMed ID: 10935308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Customizing fetal biometric charts.
Pang MW; Leung TN; Sahota DS; Lau TK; Chang AM
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 22(3):271-6. PubMed ID: 12942500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Longitudinal z Score Distribution in Sonographic Fetal Biometry: Influence of Examiner and Experience.
Faschingbauer F; Heimrich J; Raabe E; Kehl S; Schneider M; Schmid M; Beckmann MW; Schild RL; Mayr A
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 May; 36(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28258637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal age assessment based on femur length at 10-25 weeks of gestation, and reference ranges for femur length to head circumference ratios.
Johnsen SL; Rasmussen S; Sollien R; Kiserud T
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Aug; 84(8):725-33. PubMed ID: 16026396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
