151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23804392)
1. Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin fructose agar (CCFA), CCFA with horse blood and taurocholate, and cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate and lysozyme for recovery of Clostridium difficile isolates from fecal samples.
Tyrrell KL; Citron DM; Leoncio ES; Merriam CV; Goldstein EJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 51(9):3094-6. PubMed ID: 23804392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved recovery of Clostridium difficile spores with the incorporation of synthetic taurocholate in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA).
Foster NF; Riley TV
Pathology; 2012 Jun; 44(4):354-6. PubMed ID: 22531346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of culture based methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples in a research setting.
Lister M; Stevenson E; Heeg D; Minton NP; Kuehne SA
Anaerobe; 2014 Aug; 28():226-9. PubMed ID: 25038491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth for recovery of Clostridium difficile from environmental sites.
Clabots CR; Bettin KM; Peterson LR; Gerding DN
J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Nov; 29(11):2633-5. PubMed ID: 1774277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA) and taurocholate-CCFA for recovery of Clostridium difficile during surveillance of hospitalized patients.
Bliss DZ; Johnson S; Clabots CR; Savik K; Gerding DN
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1997 Sep; 29(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 9350408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and Validation of a New Protocol for Detecting and Recovering Clostridium difficile from Meat Samples.
Biasizzo M; Vadnjal S; Henigman U; Krizman M; Kirbis A; Jamnikar-Ciglenecki U
J Food Prot; 2018 Apr; 81(4):561-568. PubMed ID: 29517350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter evaluation of the Verigene Clostridium difficile nucleic acid assay.
Carroll KC; Buchan BW; Tan S; Stamper PD; Riebe KM; Pancholi P; Kelly C; Rao A; Fader R; Cavagnolo R; Watson W; Goering RV; Trevino EA; Weissfeld AS; Ledeboer NA
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Dec; 51(12):4120-5. PubMed ID: 24088862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A systematic evaluation of methods to optimize culture-based recovery of Clostridium difficile from stool specimens.
Hink T; Burnham CA; Dubberke ER
Anaerobe; 2013 Feb; 19():39-43. PubMed ID: 23247066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of sodium taurocholate to enhance spore recovery on a medium selective for Clostridium difficile.
Wilson KH; Kennedy MJ; Fekety FR
J Clin Microbiol; 1982 Mar; 15(3):443-6. PubMed ID: 7076817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.
Nerandzic MM; Donskey CJ
J Clin Microbiol; 2009 Feb; 47(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 19073869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the chromogenic agar chromID C. difficile.
Eckert C; Burghoffer B; Lalande V; Barbut F
J Clin Microbiol; 2013 Mar; 51(3):1002-4. PubMed ID: 23269743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of five cultural procedures for isolation of Clostridium difficile from stools.
Marler LM; Siders JA; Wolters LC; Pettigrew Y; Skitt BL; Allen SD
J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Feb; 30(2):514-6. PubMed ID: 1537928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar and L-proline-aminopeptidase (PRO Discs) in the rapid identification of Clostridium difficile.
Fedorko DP; Williams EC
J Clin Microbiol; 1997 May; 35(5):1258-9. PubMed ID: 9114419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isolation of Clostridium difficile from faecal specimens--a comparison of chromID C. difficile agar and cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar.
Carson KC; Boseiwaqa LV; Thean SK; Foster NF; Riley TV
J Med Microbiol; 2013 Sep; 62(Pt 9):1423-1427. PubMed ID: 23579394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clostridium difficile from healthy food animals: optimized isolation and prevalence.
Thitaram SN; Frank JF; Lyon SA; Siragusa GR; Bailey JS; Lombard JE; Haley CA; Wagner BA; Dargatz DA; Fedorka-Cray PJ
J Food Prot; 2011 Jan; 74(1):130-3. PubMed ID: 21219775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of a selective enrichment broth to recover Clostridium difficile from stool swabs stored under different conditions.
Arroyo LG; Rousseau J; Willey BM; Low DE; Staempfli H; McGeer A; Weese JS
J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Oct; 43(10):5341-3. PubMed ID: 16208013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Isolation and quantitation of Clostridium difficile in aqueous and fecal matter using two types of selective media.
Housman ST; Banevicius MA; Lamb LM; Nicolau DP
J Microbiol Immunol Infect; 2016 Jun; 49(3):445-7. PubMed ID: 26198865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Laboratory detection of Clostridium difficile. A comparison of media and incubation systems.
Mundy LS; Shanholtzer CJ; Willard KE; Gerding DN; Peterson LR
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jan; 103(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 7817945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of selective media for optimal recovery of Clostridium difficile from diarrhoeal stools.
Niyogi SK; Pal SC
Indian J Med Res; 1992 Jul; 95():181-3. PubMed ID: 1398806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selective and differential medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile.
George WL; Sutter VL; Citron D; Finegold SM
J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Feb; 9(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 429542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
