These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23804421)
1. Remote ischemic conditioning in percutaneous coronary intervention: renal effect beyond the cardioprotection. Liu Y; Luo B Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(6):1017. PubMed ID: 23804421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of remote ischemic preconditioning on serum troponin T level following elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Ahmed RM; Mohamed el-HA; Ashraf M; Maithili S; Nabil F; Rami R; Mohamed TI Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 82(5):E647-53. PubMed ID: 23404916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Remote ischemic preconditioning immediately before percutaneous coronary intervention does not impact myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and circulating endothelial progenitor cell counts: a single center randomized sham controlled trial. Prasad A; Gössl M; Hoyt J; Lennon RJ; Polk L; Simari R; Holmes DR; Rihal CS; Lerman A Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):930-6. PubMed ID: 22517646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Remote ischemic preconditioning improves outcome at 6 years after elective percutaneous coronary intervention: the CRISP stent trial long-term follow-up. Davies WR; Brown AJ; Watson W; McCormick LM; West NE; Dutka DP; Hoole SP Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jun; 6(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 23696599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Remote ischemic preconditioning in elective percutaneous coronary intervention does not protect myocardium nor mobilize endothelial progenitor cells. Abdel-Latif A; Moliterno DJ Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 May; 81(6):937-8. PubMed ID: 23606488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Interference of propofol with signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 activation and cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning during coronary artery bypass grafting. Kottenberg E; Musiolik J; Thielmann M; Jakob H; Peters J; Heusch G J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan; 147(1):376-82. PubMed ID: 23465551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Remote Ischemic Conditioning for Preventing Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions/Coronary Angiography: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Bei WJ; Duan CY; Chen JY; Wang K; Liu YH; Liu Y; Tan N J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther; 2016 Jan; 21(1):53-63. PubMed ID: 26112028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Repeated Episodes of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for the Prevention of Myocardial Injury in Vascular Surgery. Thomas KN; Cotter JD; Williams MJ; van Rij AM Vasc Endovascular Surg; 2016 Apr; 50(3):140-6. PubMed ID: 27075990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardioprotective role of remote ischemic periconditioning in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: enhancement by opioid action. Rentoukas I; Giannopoulos G; Kaoukis A; Kossyvakis C; Raisakis K; Driva M; Panagopoulou V; Tsarouchas K; Vavetsi S; Pyrgakis V; Deftereos S JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jan; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 20129568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Why did remote ischaemic conditioning not improve clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial? Hausenloy DJ; Bøtker HE Cardiovasc Res; 2019 Dec; 115(14):e161-e163. PubMed ID: 31621833 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Which is more important in the potential interference on cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning: β-blockers or anesthetic choice? Liu Y; Ma L J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Nov; 146(5):1305-6. PubMed ID: 24128912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Post-conditioning for cardioprotection during reperfusion therapy: too good to be true? Prasad A JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Jan; 3(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 20129569 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Remote ischemic preconditioning in percutaneous coronary revascularization: a double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Ghaemian A; Nouraei SM; Abdollahian F; Naghshvar F; Giussani DA; Nouraei SA Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2012 Oct; 20(5):548-54. PubMed ID: 23087298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gender disparity may contribute to the quasi preservation of cardioprotection by remote preconditioning with isoflurane but not propofol in CABG. Zhou C J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2013 Sep; 146(3):732-3. PubMed ID: 23953310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Conditioning techniques and ischemic reperfusion injury in relation to on-pump cardiac surgery. Holmberg FE; Ottas KA; Andreasen C; Perko MJ; Møller CH; Engstrøm T; Steinbrüchel DA Scand Cardiovasc J; 2014 Aug; 48(4):241-8. PubMed ID: 24852515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A pilot study investigating the effects of remote ischemic preconditioning in high-risk cardiac surgery using a randomised controlled double-blind protocol. Young PJ; Dalley P; Garden A; Horrocks C; La Flamme A; Mahon B; Miller J; Pilcher J; Weatherall M; Williams J; Young W; Beasley R Basic Res Cardiol; 2012 May; 107(3):256. PubMed ID: 22406977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of non-invasive remote ischemic preconditioning on intra-renal perfusion in volunteers. Robert R; Vinet M; Jamet A; Coudroy R J Nephrol; 2017 Jun; 30(3):393-395. PubMed ID: 27198136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of one-cycle remote ischemic preconditioning to reduce myocardial injury during percutaneous coronary intervention. Zografos TA; Katritsis GD; Tsiafoutis I; Bourboulis N; Katsivas A; Katritsis DG Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(12):2013-7. PubMed ID: 24793669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remote ischemic preconditioning in cardiac surgery: caught between clinical relevance and statistical significance? Thielmann M Basic Res Cardiol; 2012 May; 107(3):259. PubMed ID: 22431064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]