These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2380448)

  • 1. Masking and stimulus intensity effects on duplex perception: a confirmation of the dissociation between speech and nonspeech modes.
    Bentin S; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 2380448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorical perception of nonspeech chirps and bleats.
    Pastore RE; Li XF; Layer JK
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 2385489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A reexamination of duplex perception evoked by intensity differences.
    Bailey PJ; Herrmann P
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 8351185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new version of duplex perception: evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion.
    Nygaard LC; Eimas PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 2380449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of auditory streaming on duplex perception.
    Ciocca V; Bregman AS
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 2755760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors.
    Fowler CA; Rosenblum LD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):742-54. PubMed ID: 2148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neurological evidence in support of a specialized phonetic processing module.
    Gokcen JM; Fox RA
    Brain Lang; 2001 Aug; 78(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 11500073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stimulus intensity and fundamental frequency effects on duplex perception.
    Vorperian HK; Ochs MT; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):734-44. PubMed ID: 7642812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speech perception takes precedence over nonspeech perception.
    Whalen DH; Liberman AM
    Science; 1987 Jul; 237(4811):169-71. PubMed ID: 3603014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An auditory basis for the stimulus-length effect in the perception of stops and glides.
    Diehl RL; Walsh MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 May; 85(5):2154-64. PubMed ID: 2732389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impaired Categorical Perception of Speech Sounds Under the Backward Masking Condition in Adults Who Stutter.
    Shao J; Bakhtiar M; Zhang C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 65(7):2554-2570. PubMed ID: 35858255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formant transition duration and amplitude rise time as cues to the stop/glide distinction.
    Walsh MA; Diehl RL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):603-20. PubMed ID: 1775659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Automaticity in speech perception: some speech/nonspeech comparisons.
    Johnson K; Ralston JV
    Phonetica; 1994; 51(4):195-209. PubMed ID: 7938203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the effect of onset asynchrony on auditory grouping in pitch matching and vowel identification.
    Hukin RW; Darwin CJ
    Percept Psychophys; 1995 Feb; 57(2):191-6. PubMed ID: 7885817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consonant identification under maskers with sinusoidal modulation: masking release or modulation interference?
    Kwon BJ; Turner CW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1130-40. PubMed ID: 11519580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Individual differences in the processing of speech and nonspeech sounds by normal-hearing listeners.
    Surprenant AM; Watson CS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2085-95. PubMed ID: 11681386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: effects of acoustic differences and lexical status.
    Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):268-286. PubMed ID: 8473839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Could temporal order differences underlie 2-month-olds' discrimination of English voicing contrasts?
    Jusczyk PW; Rosner BS; Reed MA; Kennedy LJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Apr; 85(4):1741-9. PubMed ID: 2708690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Auditory coding, cues, and coherence in phonetic perception.
    Sawusch JR; Gagnon DA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Jun; 21(3):635-52. PubMed ID: 7790838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comodulation masking release for speech stimuli.
    Grose JH; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Feb; 91(2):1042-50. PubMed ID: 1556306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.