These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2380449)

  • 1. A new version of duplex perception: evidence for phonetic and nonphonetic fusion.
    Nygaard LC; Eimas PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):75-86. PubMed ID: 2380449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A reexamination of duplex perception evoked by intensity differences.
    Bailey PJ; Herrmann P
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Jul; 54(1):20-32. PubMed ID: 8351185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of auditory streaming on duplex perception.
    Ciocca V; Bregman AS
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jul; 46(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 2755760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phonetic coherence in duplex perception: effects of acoustic differences and lexical status.
    Nygaard LC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Apr; 19(2):268-286. PubMed ID: 8473839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masking and stimulus intensity effects on duplex perception: a confirmation of the dissociation between speech and nonspeech modes.
    Bentin S; Mann V
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jul; 88(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 2380448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The phonetic integration of speech and non-speech sounds: effects of perceived location.
    Ciocca V; Bregman AS; Capreol KL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1992 Apr; 44(3):577-93. PubMed ID: 1631323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stimulus intensity and fundamental frequency effects on duplex perception.
    Vorperian HK; Ochs MT; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Aug; 98(2 Pt 1):734-44. PubMed ID: 7642812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Limits on phonetic integration in duplex perception.
    Whalen DH; Liberman AM
    Percept Psychophys; 1996 Aug; 58(6):857-70. PubMed ID: 8768181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Duplex perception: some initial findings concerning its neural basis.
    Cranney J; Fowler CA; Musiek F
    Brain Cogn; 1989 Jan; 9(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 2912474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selective anchoring and adaptation of phonetic and nonphonetic continua.
    Simon HJ; Studdert-Kennedy M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Nov; 64(5):1338-57. PubMed ID: 744835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Insights from a failure of selective adaptation: syllable-initial and syllable-final consonants are different.
    Samuel AG
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Jun; 45(6):485-93. PubMed ID: 2740189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners' ongoing percept for speech.
    Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
    Cereb Cortex; 2023 Sep; 33(18):10076-10086. PubMed ID: 37522248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Short-term reorganization of auditory analysis induced by phonetic experience.
    Liebenthal E; Binder JR; Piorkowski RL; Remez RE
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 May; 15(4):549-58. PubMed ID: 12803966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners' ongoing percept for speech.
    Rizzi R; Bidelman GM
    bioRxiv; 2023 May; ():. PubMed ID: 37214801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB; Won JH; Moon IJ
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Formant transition duration and amplitude rise time as cues to the stop/glide distinction.
    Walsh MA; Diehl RL
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1991 Aug; 43(3):603-20. PubMed ID: 1775659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Some effects of speaking rate on phonetic perception.
    Miller JL
    Phonetica; 1981; 38(1-3):159-80. PubMed ID: 7267718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Frequency resolution and discrimination of constant and dynamic tones in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Wood EJ; Fernandes M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1190-9. PubMed ID: 6643841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Information in speech: observations on the perception of [s]-stop clusters.
    Bailey PJ; Summerfield Q
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Aug; 6(3):536-63. PubMed ID: 6447767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of transition length on the perception of stop consonants.
    Keating P; Blumstein SE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1978 Jul; 64(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 712002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.