These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2380449)

  • 21. Discrimination of formant transition onset frequency: psychoacoustic cues at short, moderate, and long durations.
    Porter RJ; Cullen JK; Collins MJ; Jackson DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Sep; 90(3):1298-308. PubMed ID: 1939896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency and duration discrimination of short first-formant speechlike transitions.
    van Wieringen A; Pols LC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):502-11. PubMed ID: 8120261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions.
    Elliott LL; Hammer MA; Scholl ME; Wasowicz JM
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Aug; 46(2):181-6. PubMed ID: 2762106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attentional modulation of the phonetic significance of acoustic cues.
    Gordon PC; Eberhardt JL; Rueckl JG
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Jan; 25(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 8425384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Phonetic perception: evidence for context-dependent and context-independent processing.
    Miller JL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Mar; 69(3):822-31. PubMed ID: 7240563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Discrimination and Identification of a Third Formant Frequency Cue to Place of Articulation by Young Children and Adults.
    Richardson K; Sussman JE
    Lang Speech; 2017 Mar; 60(1):27-47. PubMed ID: 28326988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neurological evidence in support of a specialized phonetic processing module.
    Gokcen JM; Fox RA
    Brain Lang; 2001 Aug; 78(2):241-53. PubMed ID: 11500073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Speech pattern hearing aids for the profoundly hearing impaired: speech perception and auditory abilities.
    Faulkner A; Ball V; Rosen S; Moore BC; Fourcin A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2136-55. PubMed ID: 1597605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Rise time and formant transition duration in the discrimination of speech sounds: the Ba-Wa distinction in developmental dyslexia.
    Goswami U; Fosker T; Huss M; Mead N; Szucs D
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jan; 14(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 21159086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Contextual effects in infant speech perception.
    Eimas PD; Miller JL
    Science; 1980 Sep; 209(4461):1140-1. PubMed ID: 7403875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Duplex perception: a comparison of monosyllables and slamming doors.
    Fowler CA; Rosenblum LD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Nov; 16(4):742-54. PubMed ID: 2148589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cues for lexical tone perception in children: acoustic correlates and phonetic context effects.
    Tong X; McBride C; Burnham D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):1589-605. PubMed ID: 24817506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Categorical perception of nonspeech chirps and bleats.
    Pastore RE; Li XF; Layer JK
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Aug; 48(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 2385489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stimulus dominance in fused dichotic syllables: trouble for the category goodness hypothesis.
    Repp BH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Jan; 67(1):288-305. PubMed ID: 7354197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of first formant onset properties on voicing judgments result from processes not specific to humans.
    Kluender KR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Jul; 90(1):83-96. PubMed ID: 1880303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vowel formant discrimination II: Effects of stimulus uncertainty, consonantal context, and training.
    Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2141-55. PubMed ID: 11681391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Acoustics and perception of overtone singing.
    Bloothooft G; Bringmann E; van Cappellen M; van Luipen JB; Thomassen KP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Oct; 92(4 Pt 1):1827-36. PubMed ID: 1401528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The role of spectral cues in discrimination of voice onset time differences.
    Soli SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Jun; 73(6):2150-65. PubMed ID: 6875101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Phonetic identification by elderly normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dorman MF; Marton K; Hannley MT; Lindholm JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Feb; 77(2):664-70. PubMed ID: 3973237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Neural Correlates of Phonetic Learning in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller S; Zhang Y; Nelson P
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):514-28. PubMed ID: 26928002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.