These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2380478)
1. Identification of contact allergens using the murine local lymph node assay: comparisons with the Buehler occluded patch test in guinea pigs. Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA J Appl Toxicol; 1990 Jun; 10(3):173-80. PubMed ID: 2380478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A murine local lymph node assay for the identification of contact allergens. Assay development and results of an initial validation study. Kimber I; Weisenberger C Arch Toxicol; 1989; 63(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 2788401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Draining lymph node cell activation in guinea pigs: comparisons with the murine local lymph node assay. Maurer T; Kimber I Toxicology; 1991; 69(2):209-18. PubMed ID: 1949049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Anamnestic responses to contact allergens: application in the murine local lymph node assay. Kimber I; Weisenberger C J Appl Toxicol; 1991 Apr; 11(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 2061551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The murine local lymph node assay: results of an inter-laboratory trial. Kimber I; Hilton J; Botham PA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Gray TJ; Waite SJ Toxicol Lett; 1991 Feb; 55(2):203-13. PubMed ID: 1998208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay. Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Cooper KJ; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Results with OECD recommended positive control sensitizers in the maximization, Buehler and local lymph node assays. Basketter DA; Selbie E; Scholes EW; Lees D; Kimber I; Botham PA Food Chem Toxicol; 1993 Jan; 31(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8444389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test. Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The local lymph node assay: developments and applications. Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Basketter DA Toxicology; 1994 Sep; 93(1):13-31. PubMed ID: 7974502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A review of the Buehler guinea pig skin sensitization test and its use in a risk assessment process for human skin sensitization. Robinson MK; Nusair TL; Fletcher ER; Ritz HL Toxicology; 1990 Apr; 61(2):91-107. PubMed ID: 2181736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens. Basketter DA; Scholes EW Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 1544608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preclinical skin sensitization testing of antihistamines: guinea pig and local lymph node assay responses. Robinson MK; Cruze CA Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 May; 34(5):495-506. PubMed ID: 8655100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The local lymph node assay: a viable alternative to currently accepted skin sensitization tests. Basketter DA; Gerberick GF; Kimber I; Loveless SE Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Oct; 34(10):985-97. PubMed ID: 9012774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An international evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay and comparison of modified procedures. Kimber I; Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Ladics GS; Loveless SE; House RV Toxicology; 1995 Nov; 103(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 8525491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experience with the murine local lymph node assay: inability to discriminate between allergens and irritants. Montelius J; Wahlkvist H; Boman A; Fernström P; Gråbergs L; Wahlberg JE Acta Derm Venereol; 1994 Jan; 74(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 7908482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment. Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy. Frankild S; Vølund A; Wahlberg JE; Andersen KE Acta Derm Venereol; 2000; 80(4):256-62. PubMed ID: 11028857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience. Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]