These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2380478)
21. Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates. Durand G; de Burlet G; Virat M; Nauman BD Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 14678211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The local lymph node assay: an interlaboratory evaluation of interleukin 6 (IL-6) production by draining lymph node cells. Dearman RJ; Scholes EW; Ramdin LS; Basketter DA; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 1994; 14(4):287-91. PubMed ID: 7963242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The local lymph node assay: results of a final inter-laboratory validation under field conditions. Scholes EW; Basketter DA; Sarll AE; Kimber I; Evans CD; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Waite SJ J Appl Toxicol; 1992 Jun; 12(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 1629518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Assessment of contact sensitivity of four thiourea rubber accelerators: comparison of two mouse lymph node assays with the guinea pig maximization test. Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Momma J; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1067-72. PubMed ID: 7959462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Local lymph node assay: differentiating allergic and irritant responses using flow cytometry. Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Ryan CA Methods; 1999 Sep; 19(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 10525437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Inter-relationships between different classes of chemical allergens. Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 2013 Jul; 33(7):558-65. PubMed ID: 22271251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of sensitive mouse lymph node assay for detection of contact sensitization capacity of dyes. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A J Appl Toxicol; 1996; 16(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 8854222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A sensitive mouse lymph node assay with two application phases for detection of contact allergens. Ikarashi Y; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A Arch Toxicol; 1993; 67(9):629-36. PubMed ID: 8311690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Activity of human contact allergens in the murine local lymph node assay. Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Cruse LW; Basketter DA; Lea L; Blaikie L; Dearman RJ; Warbrick EV; Kimber I Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Aug; 43(2):95-102. PubMed ID: 10945748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Gene expression profiles in auricle skin as a possible additional endpoint for determination of sensitizers: A multi-endpoint evaluation of the local lymph node assay. Tsuchiyama H; Maeda A; Nakajima M; Kitsukawa M; Takahashi K; Miyoshi T; Mutsuga M; Asaoka Y; Miyamoto Y; Oshida K Toxicol Lett; 2017 Oct; 280():133-141. PubMed ID: 28826779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Experimental assessment of the sensitizing properties of formaldehyde. Hilton J; Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I Food Chem Toxicol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 8690318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A comparative study of the sensitivity of the 3-induction and 9-induction Buehler test procedures for assessing skin sensitisation potential. Botham P; Urtizberea M; Wiemann C; Manciaux X; Tilbury L; Vohr HW; Allen S; Carmichael NG; de Jouffrey S Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Jan; 43(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 15582197 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay. Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Screening petrochemicals for contact hypersensitivity potential: a comparison of the murine local lymph node assay with guinea pig and human test data. Edwards DA; Soranno TM; Amoruso MA; House RV; Tummey AC; Trimmer GW; Thomas PT; Ribeiro PL Fundam Appl Toxicol; 1994 Aug; 23(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 7982526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Unsaturated fatty acids show clear elicitation responses in a modified local lymph node assay with an elicitation phase, and test positive in the direct peptide reactivity assay. Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Miyazaki H; Itagaki H J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Dec; 40(6):843-53. PubMed ID: 26558466 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. Dean JH; Twerdok LE; Tice RR; Sailstad DM; Hattan DG; Stokes WS Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):258-73. PubMed ID: 11754530 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]