These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23805235)
41. Comparative sensitivity of PCR primer sets for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Yu JR; Lee SU; Park WY Korean J Parasitol; 2009 Sep; 47(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 19724705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Assessment of the viability of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts with the induction ratio of hsp70 mRNA production in manure. Garcés-Sanchez G; Wilderer PA; Horn H; Munch JC; Lebuhn M J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Sep; 94(3):280-9. PubMed ID: 23747597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium by real-time polymerase chain reaction in stool samples from patients in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Rolando RF; Silva Sd; Peralta RH; Silva AJ; Cunha Fde S; Bello AR; Peralta JM Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz; 2012 Jun; 107(4):476-9. PubMed ID: 22666857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Development of a PCR protocol for sensitive detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water samples. Johnson DW; Pieniazek NJ; Griffin DW; Misener L; Rose JB Appl Environ Microbiol; 1995 Nov; 61(11):3849-55. PubMed ID: 8526496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Immunoassay for viable Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in turbid environmental water samples. Call JL; Arrowood M; Xie LT; Hancock K; Tsang VC J Parasitol; 2001 Feb; 87(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 11227892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A new set of primers directed to 18S rRNA gene for molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. and their performance in the detection and differentiation of oocysts shed by synanthropic rodents. Silva SO; Richtzenhain LJ; Barros IN; Gomes AM; Silva AV; Kozerski ND; de Araújo Ceranto JB; Keid LB; Soares RM Exp Parasitol; 2013 Nov; 135(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 24036321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Application of a qPCR assay with melting curve analysis for detection and differentiation of protozoan oocysts in human fecal samples from Dominican Republic. Lalonde LF; Reyes J; Gajadhar AA Am J Trop Med Hyg; 2013 Nov; 89(5):892-8. PubMed ID: 24019437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Identification of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in Scottish raw and drinking waters during a one-year monitoring period. Nichols RA; Connelly L; Sullivan CB; Smith HV Appl Environ Microbiol; 2010 Sep; 76(17):5977-86. PubMed ID: 20639357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A waterborne outbreak and detection of cryptosporidium oocysts in drinking water of an older high-rise apartment complex in seoul. Cho EJ; Yang JY; Lee ES; Kim SC; Cha SY; Kim ST; Lee MH; Han SH; Park YS Korean J Parasitol; 2013 Aug; 51(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 24039290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Development and evaluation of a real-time PCR for genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. from water monitoring slides. Elwin K; Robinson G; Pérez-Cordón G; Chalmers RM Exp Parasitol; 2022 Nov; 242():108366. PubMed ID: 36089005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparison of most probable number-PCR and most probable number-foci detection method for quantifying infectious Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in environmental samples. Carey CM; Lee H; Trevors JT J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Nov; 67(2):363-72. PubMed ID: 16730821 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Real-time PCR for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum. Higgins JA; Fayer R; Trout JM; Xiao L; Lal AA; Kerby S; Jenkins MC J Microbiol Methods; 2001 Dec; 47(3):323-37. PubMed ID: 11714523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Two novel genomic DNA sequences as common diagnostic targets to detect Shrivastava AK; Panda S; Kumar S; Sahu PS Indian J Med Microbiol; 2020; 38(3 & 4):430-439. PubMed ID: 33154258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Development of an IMS-qPCR method for detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in water]. Gao SS; Wu SQ; Luo J; Wang CM; Zhang M; Zhao BH; He HX Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 31(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 24812853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Evaluation of two methods for quantification of hsp70 mRNA from the waterborne pathogen Cryptosporidium parvum by reverse transcription real-time PCR in environmental samples. Garcés-Sanchez G; Wilderer PA; Munch JC; Horn H; Lebuhn M Water Res; 2009 Jun; 43(10):2669-78. PubMed ID: 19401258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Seasonal variation in the prevalence and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium infection in dairy cattle in the New York City Watershed. Szonyi B; Bordonaro R; Wade SE; Mohammed HO Parasitol Res; 2010 Jul; 107(2):317-25. PubMed ID: 20397026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Longitudinal prevalence, oocyst shedding and molecular characterisation of Cryptosporidium species in sheep across four states in Australia. Yang R; Jacobson C; Gardner G; Carmichael I; Campbell AJ; Ng-Hublin J; Ryan U Vet Parasitol; 2014 Feb; 200(1-2):50-8. PubMed ID: 24332963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Real-time PCR detection and speciation of Cryptosporidium infection using Scorpion probes. Stroup SE; Roy S; Mchele J; Maro V; Ntabaguzi S; Siddique A; Kang G; Guerrant RL; Kirkpatrick BD; Fayer R; Herbein J; Ward H; Haque R; Houpt ER J Med Microbiol; 2006 Sep; 55(Pt 9):1217-1222. PubMed ID: 16914651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Evaluation of methods for improved detection of Cryptosporidium spp. in mussels (Mytilus californianus). Miller WA; Gardner IA; Atwill ER; Leutenegger CM; Miller MA; Hedrick RP; Melli AC; Barnes NM; Conrad PA J Microbiol Methods; 2006 Jun; 65(3):367-79. PubMed ID: 16181691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of infectious Cryptosporidium oocysts by cell culture immunofluorescence assay: applicability to environmental samples. Schets FM; Engels GB; During M; de Roda Husman AM Appl Environ Microbiol; 2005 Nov; 71(11):6793-8. PubMed ID: 16269711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]