These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23806176)

  • 21. An ERP investigation of visual word recognition in syllabary scripts.
    Okano K; Grainger J; Holcomb PJ
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2013 Jun; 13(2):390-404. PubMed ID: 23378278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Perceptual and lexical effects in letter identification: an event-related potential study of the word superiority effect.
    Martin CD; Nazir T; Thierry G; Paulignan Y; Démonet JF
    Brain Res; 2006 Jul; 1098(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 16774747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The case of letter rhyming: an ERP study.
    Coch D; George E; Berger N
    Psychophysiology; 2008 Nov; 45(6):949-56. PubMed ID: 18823423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Rapid implicit extraction of abstract orthographic patterns of Chinese characters during reading.
    Zhang X; Yang S; Jiang M
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(2):e0229590. PubMed ID: 32084247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the time course of letter perception: a masked priming ERP investigation.
    Petit JP; Midgley KJ; Holcomb PJ; Grainger J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Aug; 13(4):674-81. PubMed ID: 17201369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. How is letter position coding attained in scripts with position-dependent allography?
    Yakup M; Abliz W; Sereno J; Perea M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1600-6. PubMed ID: 25023954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relative laterality of the N170 to single letter stimuli is predicted by a concurrent neural index of implicit processing of letter names.
    Stevens C; McIlraith A; Rusk N; Niermeyer M; Waller H
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Mar; 51(4):667-74. PubMed ID: 23274433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of alphabet and expertise on letter perception.
    Wiley RW; Wilson C; Rapp B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Aug; 42(8):1186-203. PubMed ID: 26913778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An Event-Related Potential study of letter spacing during visual word recognition.
    Sacchi E; Mirchin R; Laszlo S
    Brain Res; 2018 Apr; 1684():9-20. PubMed ID: 29409766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters.
    Aiello M; Merola S; Lasaponara S; Pinto M; Tomaiuolo F; Doricchi F
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():75-85. PubMed ID: 29233717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Letter identity and visual similarity in the processing of diacritic letters.
    Kinoshita S; Yu L; Verdonschot RG; Norris D
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):815-825. PubMed ID: 33469882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Exploring the temporal dynamics of visual word recognition in the masked repetition priming paradigm using event-related potentials.
    Holcomb PJ; Grainger J
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1180():39-58. PubMed ID: 17950262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Language experience shapes early electrophysiological responses to visual stimuli: the effects of writing system, stimulus length, and presentation duration.
    Xue G; Jiang T; Chen C; Dong Q
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2025-37. PubMed ID: 18053744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shared or separated representations for letters with diacritics?
    Chetail F; Boursain E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):347-352. PubMed ID: 29987764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Congruency of auditory sounds and visual letters modulates mismatch negativity and P300 event-related potentials.
    Andres AJ; Oram Cardy JE; Joanisse MF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Feb; 79(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 20888870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A compositional neural code in high-level visual cortex can explain jumbled word reading.
    Agrawal A; Hari K; Arun SP
    Elife; 2020 May; 9():. PubMed ID: 32369017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Context-dependent similarity effects in letter recognition.
    Kinoshita S; Robidoux S; Guilbert D; Norris D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1458-64. PubMed ID: 25855201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Semantic similarity influences early morphological priming in Serbian: a challenge to form-then-meaning accounts of word recognition.
    Feldman LB; Kostić A; Gvozdenović V; O'Connor PA; Moscoso del Prado Martín F
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):668-76. PubMed ID: 22477336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.