These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23806274)

  • 1. Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review.
    Peleg M
    J Biomed Inform; 2013 Aug; 46(4):744-63. PubMed ID: 23806274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines. Where are we and where are we going ?
    Sonnenberg FA; Hagerty CG
    Yearb Med Inform; 2006; ():145-58. PubMed ID: 17051309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH; Patel VL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11604741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. META-GLARE: A meta-system for defining your own computer interpretable guideline system-Architecture and acquisition.
    Bottrighi A; Terenziani P
    Artif Intell Med; 2016 Sep; 72():22-41. PubMed ID: 27664506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Automated generation of patient-tailored electronic care pathways by translating computer-interpretable guidelines into hierarchical task networks.
    González-Ferrer A; ten Teije A; Fdez-Olivares J; Milian K
    Artif Intell Med; 2013 Feb; 57(2):91-109. PubMed ID: 23177024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Toward a representation format for sharable clinical guidelines.
    Boxwala AA; Tu S; Peleg M; Zeng Q; Ogunyemi O; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH; Patel VL
    J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):157-69. PubMed ID: 11723698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Approaches for guideline versioning using GLIF.
    Peleg M; Kantor R
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():509-13. PubMed ID: 14728225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A goal-oriented framework for specifying clinical guidelines and handling medical errors.
    Grando A; Peleg M; Glasspool D
    J Biomed Inform; 2010 Apr; 43(2):287-99. PubMed ID: 19944779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A formal approach to the analysis of clinical computer-interpretable guideline modeling languages.
    Grando MA; Glasspool D; Fox J
    Artif Intell Med; 2012 Jan; 54(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 21788121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interplay between Clinical Guidelines and Organizational Workflow Systems. Experience from the MobiGuide Project.
    Shabo A; Peleg M; Parimbelli E; Quaglini S; Napolitano C
    Methods Inf Med; 2016 Dec; 55(6):488-494. PubMed ID: 27406905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. XML Data and Knowledge-Encoding Structure for a Web-Based and Mobile Antenatal Clinical Decision Support System: Development Study.
    Torres Silva EA; Uribe S; Smith J; Luna Gomez IF; Florez-Arango JF
    JMIR Form Res; 2020 Oct; 4(10):e17512. PubMed ID: 33064087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding a clinical practice guideline using guideline interchange format: a case study of a depression screening and management guideline.
    Choi J; Currie LM; Wang D; Bakken S
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76 Suppl 2():S302-7. PubMed ID: 17600762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mapping computerized clinical guidelines to electronic medical records: knowledge-data ontological mapper (KDOM).
    Peleg M; Keren S; Denekamp Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2008 Feb; 41(1):180-201. PubMed ID: 17574928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?
    Allen D; Rixson L
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Creation of a gold standard for validation of a computer-interpretable depression screening guideline.
    Choi J; Bakken S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2006; 122():95-9. PubMed ID: 17102225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of primary care expert and computer-interpretable depression screening guideline recommendations.
    Choi J; Bakken S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():887. PubMed ID: 17238506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Approaches for creating computer-interpretable guidelines that facilitate decision support.
    de Clercq PA; Blom JA; Korsten HH; Hasman A
    Artif Intell Med; 2004 May; 31(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 15182844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of a personalized and distributed patient guidance system.
    Peleg M; Shahar Y; Quaglini S; Broens T; Budasu R; Fung N; Fux A; García-Sáez G; Goldstein A; González-Ferrer A; Hermens H; Hernando ME; Jones V; Klebanov G; Klimov D; Knoppel D; Larburu N; Marcos C; Martínez-Sarriegui I; Napolitano C; Pallàs À; Palomares A; Parimbelli E; Pons B; Rigla M; Sacchi L; Shalom E; Soffer P; van Schooten B
    Int J Med Inform; 2017 May; 101():108-130. PubMed ID: 28347441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-Interpretable Clinical Guidelines: A Review and Analysis of Evaluation Criteria for Authoring Methods.
    Khodambashi S; Slaughter L; Nytrø Ø
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2015; 216():954. PubMed ID: 26262256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-Interpretable Guideline formalisms.
    De Clercq P; Kaiser K; Hasman A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 139():22-43. PubMed ID: 18806319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.