191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23806388)
1. Do nomograms designed to predict biochemical recurrence (BCR) do a better job of predicting more clinically relevant prostate cancer outcomes than BCR? A report from the SEARCH database group.
Teeter AE; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2013 Jul; 82(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 23806388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nomogram Predicting Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality for Men with Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy.
Brockman JA; Alanee S; Vickers AJ; Scardino PT; Wood DP; Kibel AS; Lin DW; Bianco FJ; Rabah DM; Klein EA; Ciezki JP; Gao T; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Jun; 67(6):1160-1167. PubMed ID: 25301759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Are biochemical recurrence outcomes similar after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy? Analysis of prostate cancer-specific mortality by nomogram-predicted risks of biochemical recurrence.
Lee BH; Kibel AS; Ciezki JP; Klein EA; Reddy CA; Yu C; Kattan MW; Stephenson AJ
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 25294696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Postoperative prostate-specific antigen nadir improves accuracy for predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) and Duke Prostate Center databases.
Moreira DM; Presti JC; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Sun LL; Moul JW; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2010 Nov; 17(11):914-22. PubMed ID: 20880361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re-calibration and external validation of an existing nomogram to predict aggressive recurrences after radical prostatectomy.
Schroeck FR; Kattan MW; Moul JW; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Sun L; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2010 Jun; 105(12):1654-9. PubMed ID: 19912203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do nomograms predict aggressive recurrence after radical prostatectomy more accurately than biochemical recurrence alone?
Schroeck FR; Aronson WJ; Presti JC; Terris MK; Kane CJ; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2009 Mar; 103(5):603-8. PubMed ID: 19021608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term cancer control outcomes in patients with biochemical recurrence and the impact of time from radical prostatectomy to biochemical recurrence.
Pompe RS; Gild P; Karakiewicz PI; Bock LP; Schlomm T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Huland H; Tian Z; Tilki D
Prostate; 2018 Jun; 78(9):676-681. PubMed ID: 29570821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of outcome following early salvage radiotherapy among patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Briganti A; Karnes RJ; Joniau S; Boorjian SA; Cozzarini C; Gandaglia G; Hinkelbein W; Haustermans K; Tombal B; Shariat S; Sun M; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Van Poppel H; Wiegel T
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):479-86. PubMed ID: 24345725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate-specific antigen level, stage or Gleason score: which is best for predicting outcomes after radical prostatectomy, and does it vary by the outcome being measured? Results from Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Kane CJ; Cooperberg MR; Terris MK; Amling CL; Freedland SJ
Int J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(4):362-6. PubMed ID: 25728968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimum Tools for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review of Prognostic Accuracy and Validity.
Campbell JM; Raymond E; O'Callaghan ME; Vincent AD; Beckmann KR; Roder D; Evans S; McNeil J; Millar J; Zalcberg J; Borg M; Moretti KL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Oct; 15(5):e827-e834. PubMed ID: 28666689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. External validation of preoperative nomograms predicting biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.
Tanaka A; Ohori M; Paul L; Yu C; Kattan MW; Ohno Y; Tachibana M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2013 Dec; 43(12):1255-60. PubMed ID: 24146147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Impact of international variation of prostate cancer on a predictive nomogram for biochemical recurrence in clinically localised prostate cancer.
Cho YM; Jung SJ; Cho N; Kim MJ; Kattan MW; Yu C; Ahn H; Ro JY;
World J Urol; 2014 Apr; 32(2):399-405. PubMed ID: 23765315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ability of 2 pretreatment risk assessment methods to predict prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy: data from CaPSURE.
Mitchell JA; Cooperberg MR; Elkin EP; Lubeck DP; Mehta SS; Kane CJ; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2005 Apr; 173(4):1126-31. PubMed ID: 15758720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A validation of two preoperative nomograms predicting recurrence following radical prostatectomy in a cohort of European men.
Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI; Cagiannos I; Hammerer PG; Haese A; Palisaar J; Fernandez S; Noldus J; Erbersdobler A; Huland H; Scardino PT; Kattan MW
Urol Oncol; 2002; 7(4):141-6. PubMed ID: 12474529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative analysis of three risk assessment tools in Australian patients with prostate cancer.
Tamblyn DJ; Chopra S; Yu C; Kattan MW; Pinnock C; Kopsaftis T
BJU Int; 2011 Nov; 108 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 22085129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting survival of men with recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Dell'Oglio P; Suardi N; Boorjian SA; Fossati N; Gandaglia G; Tian Z; Moschini M; Capitanio U; Karakiewicz PI; Montorsi F; Karnes RJ; Briganti A
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Feb; 54():27-34. PubMed ID: 26707594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy patients do not predict long-term oncological outcomes: results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) cohort.
Mithal P; Howard LE; Aronson WJ; Terris MK; Cooperberg MR; Kane CJ; Amling C; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2016 Feb; 117(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 26010160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Incorporating artificial intelligence in urology: Supervised machine learning algorithms demonstrate comparative advantage over nomograms in predicting biochemical recurrence after prostatectomy.
Tan YG; Fang AHS; Lim JKS; Khalid F; Chen K; Ho HSS; Yuen JSP; Huang HH; Tay KJ
Prostate; 2022 Feb; 82(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 34855228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The CPC Risk Calculator: A New App to Predict Prostate-specific Antigen Recurrence During Follow-up After Radical Prostatectomy.
Røder MA; Berg KD; Loft MD; Thomsen FB; Ferrari M; Kurbegovic S; Rytgaard HC; Gruschy L; Brasso K; Gerds TA; Kjær A; Brooks JD; Iversen P
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Apr; 4(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 28753827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital (SEARCH) nomogram for risk stratification in intermediate risk group of men with prostate cancer: validation in the Duke Prostate Center database.
Jayachandran J; Schroeck F; Sun L; Gerber L; Moreira DM; Moul JW; Freedland SJ
BJU Int; 2010 Jan; 105(2):180-4. PubMed ID: 19709074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
