These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23807095)

  • 1. Quality in-training evaluation reports--does feedback drive faculty performance?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Bandiera G; White J; Wood TJ
    Acad Med; 2013 Aug; 88(8):1129-34. PubMed ID: 23807095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In-training evaluations: developing an automated screening tool to measure report quality.
    Bismil R; Dudek NL; Wood TJ
    Med Educ; 2014 Jul; 48(7):724-32. PubMed ID: 24909534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality evaluation reports: Can a faculty development program make a difference?
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Wood TJ; Dojeiji S; Bandiera G; Hatala R; Cooke L; Sadownik L
    Med Teach; 2012; 34(11):e725-31. PubMed ID: 23140304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments.
    Ginsburg S; Eva K; Regehr G
    Acad Med; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1539-44. PubMed ID: 23969371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does faculty development influence the quality of in-training evaluation reports in pharmacy?
    Wilbur K
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Nov; 17(1):222. PubMed ID: 29157239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Faculty Development- Is Some Better Than None?
    Crawford KA; Wood TJ; Lalonde KA; Dudek N
    MedEdPublish (2016); 2019; 8():18. PubMed ID: 38089342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Quality of Assessment of Learning (Qual) Score: Validity Evidence for a Scoring System Aimed at Rating Short, Workplace-Based Comments on Trainee Performance.
    Chan TM; Sebok-Syer SS; Sampson C; Monteiro S
    Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):319-329. PubMed ID: 32013584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An exploration of faculty perspectives on the in-training evaluation of residents.
    Watling CJ; Kenyon CF; Schulz V; Goldszmidt MA; Zibrowski E; Lingard L
    Acad Med; 2010 Jul; 85(7):1157-62. PubMed ID: 20592512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Donald W. Reynolds Consortium for Faculty Development to Advance Geriatrics Education (FD~AGE): a model for dissemination of subspecialty educational expertise.
    Heflin MT; Bragg EJ; Fernandez H; Christmas C; Osterweil D; Sauvigné K; Warshaw G; Cohen HJ; Leipzig R; Reuben DB; Durso SC
    Acad Med; 2012 May; 87(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 22450185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Supervisor-trainee continuity and the quality of work-based assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek NL; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    Med Educ; 2017 Dec; 51(12):1260-1268. PubMed ID: 28971502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How faculty members experience workplace-based assessment rater training: a qualitative study.
    Kogan JR; Conforti LN; Bernabeo E; Iobst W; Holmboe E
    Med Educ; 2015 Jul; 49(7):692-708. PubMed ID: 26077217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the quality of supervisors' completed clinical evaluation reports.
    Dudek NL; Marks MB; Wood TJ; Lee AC
    Med Educ; 2008 Aug; 42(8):816-22. PubMed ID: 18564093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of a novel assessment form for observing medical residents: a randomised, controlled trial.
    Donato AA; Pangaro L; Smith C; Rencic J; Diaz Y; Mensinger J; Holmboe E
    Med Educ; 2008 Dec; 42(12):1234-42. PubMed ID: 19120955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments.
    Ginsburg S; Regehr G; Lingard L; Eva KW
    Med Educ; 2015 Mar; 49(3):296-306. PubMed ID: 25693989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Twelve tips for completing quality in-training evaluation reports.
    Dudek N; Dojeiji S
    Med Teach; 2014 Dec; 36(12):1038-42. PubMed ID: 24986650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Daily Evaluation Cards Are Superior for Student Assessment Compared to Single Rater In-Training Evaluations.
    Johnston J; Pinsk M
    Med Sci Educ; 2020 Mar; 30(1):203-209. PubMed ID: 34457660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resident evaluations: the use of daily evaluation forms in rheumatology ambulatory care.
    Humphrey-Murto S; Khalidi N; Smith CD; Kaminska E; Touchie C; Keely E; Wood TJ
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Jun; 36(6):1298-303. PubMed ID: 19332624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the SETOC instrument -- Student evaluation of teaching in outpatient clinics.
    Zuberi RW; Bordage G; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2007 Feb; 12(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 17160501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rater variables associated with ITER ratings.
    Paget M; Wu C; McIlwrick J; Woloschuk W; Wright B; McLaughlin K
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Oct; 18(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 22777161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Daily Encounter Cards-Evaluating the Quality of Documented Assessments.
    Cheung WJ; Dudek N; Wood TJ; Frank JR
    J Grad Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 8(4):601-604. PubMed ID: 27777675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.