715 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23807538)
1. A comparison of the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O in an older post-acute patient population relative to the general population.
Couzner L; Crotty M; Norman R; Ratcliffe J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2013 Aug; 11(4):415-25. PubMed ID: 23807538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing measurement properties of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O, and ASCOT in frail older adults.
van Leeuwen KM; Bosmans JE; Jansen AP; Hoogendijk EO; van Tulder MW; van der Horst HE; Ostelo RW
Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 25595232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship between quality of life, health and care transition: an empirical comparison in an older post-acute population.
Couzner L; Ratcliffe J; Crotty M
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2012 Jun; 10():69. PubMed ID: 22703710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life in older adults following a hip fracture: an empirical comparison of the ICECAP-O and the EQ-5D-3 L instruments.
Milte R; Crotty M; Miller MD; Whitehead C; Ratcliffe J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2018 Sep; 16(1):173. PubMed ID: 30185193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the Relationship between Capability and Health in Older People: Can't Map, Won't Map.
Franklin M; Payne K; Elliott RA
Med Decis Making; 2018 Jan; 38(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 29056069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement between Patient and Proxy Assessments of Quality of Life among Older Adults with Vascular Cognitive Impairment Using the EQ-5D-3L and ICECAP-O.
Davis JC; Hsiung GY; Bryan S; Jacova C; Jacova P; Munkacsy M; Cheung W; Lee P; Liu-Ambrose T
PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153878. PubMed ID: 27101402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the construct validity and responsiveness of Preference-Based Measures (PBMs) in cataract surgery patients.
Breheny K; Hollingworth W; Kandiyali R; Dixon P; Loose A; Craggs P; Grzeda M; Sparrow J
Qual Life Res; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1935-1946. PubMed ID: 32080789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploration of the content validity and feasibility of the EQ-5D-3L, ICECAP-O and ASCOT in older adults.
van Leeuwen KM; Jansen AP; Muntinga ME; Bosmans JE; Westerman MJ; van Tulder MW; van der Horst HE
BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 May; 15():201. PubMed ID: 25976227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the Health-Related Quality of Life of Australian Adolescents: An Empirical Comparison of the Child Health Utility 9D and EQ-5D-Y Instruments.
Chen G; Flynn T; Stevens K; Brazier J; Huynh E; Sawyer M; Roberts R; Ratcliffe J
Value Health; 2015 Jun; 18(4):432-8. PubMed ID: 26091597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. EQ-5D-3L derived population norms for health related quality of life in Sri Lanka.
Kularatna S; Whitty JA; Johnson NW; Jayasinghe R; Scuffham PA
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e108434. PubMed ID: 25365171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.
Kreimeier S; Oppe M; Ramos-Goñi JM; Cole A; Devlin N; Herdman M; Mulhern B; Shah KK; Stolk E; Rivero-Arias O; Greiner W
Value Health; 2018 Nov; 21(11):1291-1298. PubMed ID: 30442276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of contemporaneous EQ-5D and SF-6D responses using scoring algorithms derived from similar valuation exercises.
Whitehurst DG; Norman R; Brazier JE; Viney R
Value Health; 2014 Jul; 17(5):570-7. PubMed ID: 25128050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of differences between patient and general population EQ-5D-3L values on the mean tariff scores of different patient groups.
Little MH; Reitmeir P; Peters A; Leidl R
Value Health; 2014 Jun; 17(4):364-71. PubMed ID: 24968996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. VALIDATION AND COMPARISON OF EQ-5D-3L AND SF-6D INSTRUMENTS IN A SPANISH PARKINSON´S DISEASE POPULATION SAMPLE.
Garcia-Gordillo MÁ; Del Pozo-Cruz B; Adsuar JC; Cordero-Ferrera JM; Abellan-Perpiñan JM; Sanchez-Martinez FI
Nutr Hosp; 2015 Dec; 32(6):2808-21. PubMed ID: 26667738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of FACT- and EQ-5D-based utility scores in cancer.
Pickard AS; Ray S; Ganguli A; Cella D
Value Health; 2012; 15(2):305-11. PubMed ID: 22433762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the reliability and validity of the ICECAP-A instrument in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients.
Xiong Y; Wu H; Xu J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2021 Jan; 19(1):5. PubMed ID: 33407525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Parallel Valuation: A Direct Comparison of EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L Societal Value Sets.
Law EH; Pickard AS; Xie F; Walton SM; Lee TA; Schwartz A
Med Decis Making; 2018 Nov; 38(8):968-982. PubMed ID: 30403577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing and transforming PROMIS utility values to the EQ-5D.
Hartman JD; Craig BM
Qual Life Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):725-733. PubMed ID: 29264776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the EuroQol and short form 6D in Singapore multiethnic Asian knee osteoarthritis patients scheduled for total knee replacement.
Xie F; Li SC; Luo N; Lo NN; Yeo SJ; Yang KY; Fong KY; Thumboo J
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Aug; 57(6):1043-9. PubMed ID: 17665466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How important is health status in defining quality of life for older people? An exploratory study of the views of older South Australians.
Milte CM; Walker R; Luszcz MA; Lancsar E; Kaambwa B; Ratcliffe J
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2014 Feb; 12(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 24254996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
