These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23808105)

  • 1. Drafting a "sensible" conscience clause: a proposal for meaningful conscience protections for religious employers objecting to the mandated coverage of prescription contraceptives.
    Rudary DJ
    Health Matrix Clevel; 2013; 23(1):353-94. PubMed ID: 23808105
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In good conscience: the legal trend to include prescription contraceptives in employer insurance plans and Catholic charities' "conscience clause" objection.
    Spota K
    Cathol Univers Law Rev; 2003; 52(4):1081-113. PubMed ID: 15732206
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Religious employers and exceptions to mandated coverage of contraceptives.
    Flicker LS
    Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):220-5. PubMed ID: 23472812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On the need for a federal conscience clause.
    Myers RS
    Natl Cathol Bioeth Q; 2001; 1(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 12862052
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Contraceptive Coverage and the Balance Between Conscience and Access.
    Stahl RY; Lynch HF
    JAMA; 2017 Dec; 318(22):2179-2180. PubMed ID: 29049513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An (un)clear conscience clause: the causes and consequences of statutory ambiguity in state contraceptive mandates.
    VanSickle-Ward R; Hollis-Brusky A
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2013 Aug; 38(4):683-708. PubMed ID: 23645878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prescription contraceptives: benefit whose time has come?
    Friedman MJ
    Manag Care; 2001 Oct; 10(10):62-3. PubMed ID: 11688113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The EPICC quest for prescription contraceptive insurance coverage.
    Vargas C
    Am J Law Med; 2002; 28(4):455-71. PubMed ID: 12516176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Institutional conscience and access to services: can we have both?
    Flynn C; Wilson RF
    Virtual Mentor; 2013 Mar; 15(3):226-35. PubMed ID: 23472813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Insurance: New York rejects religious challenge to law requiring employers to provide insurance coverage for contraceptives--Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Albany v. Serio.
    Gobeille B
    J Law Med Ethics; 2007; 35(3):503-6. PubMed ID: 17918669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. Interim final rules.
    ; ;
    Fed Regist; 2014 Aug; 79(166):51092-101. PubMed ID: 25167594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Pregnancy Discrimination Act: employer health insurance plans must cover prescription contraceptives.
    Kurtz JM; Mehoves C
    Empl Benefits J; 2001 Sep; 26(3):29-31. PubMed ID: 11534218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A battle over birth "control": legal and legislative employer prescription contraception benefit mandates.
    Loomis CK
    William Mary Bill Rights J; 2002 Dec; 11(1):463-94. PubMed ID: 16389684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
    Charo RA
    JAMA Intern Med; 2014 Oct; 174(10):1537-8. PubMed ID: 25024087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Catholic Charities v. Superior Court.
    California. Court of Appeal, Third District
    Wests Calif Report; 2001; 109():176-206. PubMed ID: 16479701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lack of insurance coverage for prescription contraception by an otherwise comprehensive plan as a violation of Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act--stretching the statute too far.
    Backmeyer ER
    Indiana Law Rev; 2004; 37(2):437-66. PubMed ID: 16211763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Catholic Charities of Sacramento County v. Superior Court of Sacramento County.
    California. Supreme Court
    Wests Pac Report; 2004; 85():67-108. PubMed ID: 17225342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Coverage of certain preventive services under the Affordable Care Act. Final rules.
    ; ;
    Fed Regist; 2013 Jul; 78(127):39869-99. PubMed ID: 23833808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Group health plans and health insurance issuers relating to coverage of preventive services under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Final rules.
    ; ;
    Fed Regist; 2012 Feb; 77(31):8725-30. PubMed ID: 22379684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Further Weakening of Contraceptive Coverage Under the Affordable Care Act.
    Turret ES; Kraschel KL; Curfman G
    JAMA Intern Med; 2020 Nov; 180(11):1415-1416. PubMed ID: 33074295
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.