172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23808379)
1. Fetal biometry: does patient ethnicity matter?
Parikh LI; Nolan J; Tefera E; Driggers R
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2014 Mar; 27(5):500-4. PubMed ID: 23808379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS
BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility study of early fetal growth parameters.
Verburg BO; Mulder PG; Hofman A; Jaddoe VW; Witteman JC; Steegers EA
Prenat Diagn; 2008 Apr; 28(4):323-31. PubMed ID: 18324617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
Nasrat H; Bondagji NS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Prenatal diagnose of abnormalities of fetal limb bone].
Song J; Wang X
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2010 Oct; 45(10):745-9. PubMed ID: 21176554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort.
Stirrup OT; Khalil A; D'Antonio F; Thilaganathan B;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Mar; 45(3):301-7. PubMed ID: 25052857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of fetal and parental factors on intrauterine growth measurements: results of the EDEN mother-child cohort.
Albouy-Llaty M; Thiebaugeorges O; Goua V; Magnin G; Schweitzer M; Forhan A; Lelong N; Slama R; Charles MA; Kaminski M;
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 38(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 21438052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Normal range for fetal urine production rate customized by biometry.
Peixoto-Filho FM; de Sá RA; Velarde LG; de Castro Mocarzel C; Lopes LM; Ville Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jan; 287(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 22899306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth.
Salomon LJ; Alfirevic Z; Da Silva Costa F; Deter RL; Figueras F; Ghi T; Glanc P; Khalil A; Lee W; Napolitano R; Papageorghiou A; Sotiriadis A; Stirnemann J; Toi A; Yeo G
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 31169958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reduced fetal growth velocities and the association with neonatal outcomes in appropriate-for-gestational-age neonates: a retrospective cohort study.
Hendrix MLE; van Kuijk SMJ; Gavilanes AWD; Kramer D; Spaanderman MEA; Al Nasiry S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):31. PubMed ID: 30646865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal biometry between 20-42 weeks of gestation for Polish population.
Dubiel M; Krajewski M; Pietryga M; Tretyn A; Breborowicz G; Lindquist P; Gudmundsson S
Ginekol Pol; 2008 Nov; 79(11):746-53. PubMed ID: 19140496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal transabdominal biometry at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
von Kaisenberg CS; Fritzer E; Kühling H; Jonat W
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Dec; 20(6):564-74. PubMed ID: 12493045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Growth charts of fetal biometry: a longitudinal study.
Munim S; Morris T; Baber N; Ansari Y; Azam SI
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jun; 25(6):692-8. PubMed ID: 21819339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of Z-scores to select a fetal biometric reference curve.
Sananes N; Guigue V; Kohler M; Bouffet N; Cancellier M; Hornecker F; Hunsinger MC; Kohler A; Mager C; Neumann M; Schmerber E; Tanghe M; Nisand I; Favre R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Oct; 34(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 19731264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks.
Bakalis S; Silva M; Akolekar R; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 25523866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal biometry in different ethnic groups.
Jacquemyn Y; Sys SU; Verdonk P
Early Hum Dev; 2000 Jan; 57(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10690707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks.
Fadigas C; Saiid Y; Gonzalez R; Poon LC; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):559-65. PubMed ID: 25728139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in fetal growth patterns between twins and singletons.
Hiersch L; Okby R; Freeman H; Rosen H; Nevo O; Barrett J; Melamed N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2020 Aug; 33(15):2546-2555. PubMed ID: 30501543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
