These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23808447)

  • 1. [Capacity analysis of health food choice by reference to consumers in two models of nutritional labeling; crossover study].
    Babio N; López L; Salas-Salvadó J
    Nutr Hosp; 2013; 28(1):173-81. PubMed ID: 23808447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adolescents' ability to select healthy food using two different front-of-pack food labels: a cross-over study.
    Babio N; Vicent P; López L; Benito A; Basulto J; Salas-Salvadó J
    Public Health Nutr; 2014 Jun; 17(6):1403-9. PubMed ID: 23680067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labels on Consumer Purchasing Intentions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Ducrot P; Julia C; Méjean C; Kesse-Guyot E; Touvier M; Fezeu LK; Hercberg S; Péneau S
    Am J Prev Med; 2016 May; 50(5):627-636. PubMed ID: 26699246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does front-of-pack nutrition information improve consumer ability to make healthful choices? Performance of warnings and the traffic light system in a simulated shopping experiment.
    Machín L; Aschemann-Witzel J; Curutchet MR; Giménez A; Ares G
    Appetite; 2018 Feb; 121():55-62. PubMed ID: 29102533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market.
    Kelly B; Hughes C; Chapman K; Louie JC; Dixon H; Crawford J; King L; Daube M; Slevin T
    Health Promot Int; 2009 Jun; 24(2):120-9. PubMed ID: 19336501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Helping consumers make a more conscious nutritional choice: acceptability of nutrition information at a cafeteria.
    Turconi G; Bazzano R; Roggi C; Cena H
    Public Health Nutr; 2012 May; 15(5):792-801. PubMed ID: 22122811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can nutritional information modify purchase of ultra-processed products? Results from a simulated online shopping experiment.
    Machín L; Arrúa A; Giménez A; Curutchet MR; Martínez J; Ares G
    Public Health Nutr; 2018 Jan; 21(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 28716163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can front-of-pack labelling schemes guide healthier food choices? Australian shoppers' responses to seven labelling formats.
    Watson WL; Kelly B; Hector D; Hughes C; King L; Crawford J; Sergeant J; Chapman K
    Appetite; 2014 Jan; 72():90-7. PubMed ID: 24126243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Disclosure of Nutrition Information on Consumers' Behavioral Intention in Korea.
    Choi J
    J Am Coll Nutr; 2015; 34(5):378-84. PubMed ID: 25826204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interpretive front-of-pack nutrition labels. Comparing competing recommendations.
    Maubach N; Hoek J; Mather D
    Appetite; 2014 Nov; 82():67-77. PubMed ID: 25038407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of nutritional information: analysing clusters of consumers who intend to eat healthily.
    van Buul VJ; Bolman CAW; Brouns FJPH; Lechner L
    J Nutr Sci; 2019; 8():e17. PubMed ID: 31080590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A randomized trial of calorie labeling on menus.
    Hammond D; Goodman S; Hanning R; Daniel S
    Prev Med; 2013 Dec; 57(6):860-6. PubMed ID: 24113263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guiding healthier food choice: systematic comparison of four front-of-pack labelling systems and their effect on judgements of product healthiness.
    Hodgkins CE; Raats MM; Fife-Schaw C; Peacock M; Gröppel-Klein A; Koenigstorfer J; Wasowicz G; Stysko-Kunkowska M; Gulcan Y; Kustepeli Y; Gibbs M; Shepherd R; Grunert KG
    Br J Nutr; 2015 May; 113(10):1652-63. PubMed ID: 25893314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consumer Perception of the Healthfulness of Ultra-processed Products Featuring Different Front-of-Pack Nutrition Labeling Schemes.
    Machín L; Cabrera M; Curutchet MR; Martínez J; Giménez A; Ares G
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2017 Apr; 49(4):330-338.e1. PubMed ID: 28185813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reds are more important than greens: how UK supermarket shoppers use the different information on a traffic light nutrition label in a choice experiment.
    Scarborough P; Matthews A; Eyles H; Kaur A; Hodgkins C; Raats MM; Rayner M
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2015 Dec; 12():151. PubMed ID: 26652916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Statistical Analysis of a Traffic-Light Food Rating System to Promote Healthy Nutrition and Body Weight.
    Larrivee S; Greenway FL; Johnson WD
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jun; 9(6):1336-41. PubMed ID: 26134833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Helping consumers make more healthful food choices: consumer views on modifying food labels and providing point-of-purchase nutrition information at quick-service restaurants.
    Lando AM; Labiner-Wolfe J
    J Nutr Educ Behav; 2007; 39(3):157-63. PubMed ID: 17493566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the Australasian "Health Star Rating" Front of Pack Nutritional Label System Work?
    Hamlin R; McNeill L
    Nutrients; 2016 Jun; 8(6):. PubMed ID: 27258305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Front-of-pack nutrition labels. Their effect on attention and choices when consumers have varying goals and time constraints.
    van Herpen E; Trijp HC
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):148-60. PubMed ID: 21554909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
    White J; Signal L
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Oct; 36(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 23025366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.