These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23808681)

  • 1. Quality of life, effort and disturbance perceived in noise: a comparison between employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing.
    Hua H; Karlsson J; Widén S; Möller C; Lyxell B
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Sep; 52(9):642-9. PubMed ID: 23808681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.
    Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Zhang X
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An algorithm that administers adaptive speech-in-noise testing to a specified reliability at selectable points on the psychometric function.
    Keidser G; Dillon H; Mejia J; Nguyen CV
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):795-800. PubMed ID: 23957444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On a reference-free speech quality estimator for hearing aids.
    Suelzle D; Parsa V; Falk TH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 May; 133(5):EL412-8. PubMed ID: 23656102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cognitive skills and the effect of noise on perceived effort in employees with aided hearing impairment and normal hearing.
    Hua H; Emilsson M; Ellis R; Widén S; Möller C; Lyxell B
    Noise Health; 2014; 16(69):79-88. PubMed ID: 24804711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary comparison of bone-anchored hearing instruments and a dental device as treatments for unilateral hearing loss.
    Moore BC; Popelka GR
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):678-86. PubMed ID: 23859058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of noise and working memory capacity on memory processing of speech for hearing-aid users.
    Ng EH; Rudner M; Lunner T; Pedersen MS; Rönnberg J
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):433-41. PubMed ID: 23550584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mild-Gain Hearing Aids as a Treatment for Adults with Self-Reported Hearing Difficulties.
    Roup CM; Post E; Lewis J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):477-494. PubMed ID: 29863462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
    van Esch TE; Kollmeier B; Vormann M; Lyzenga J; Houtgast T; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Athalye SP; Lutman ME; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 23570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health behavior theories as predictors of hearing-aid uptake and outcomes.
    Saunders GH; Frederick MT; Silverman SC; Nielsen C; Laplante-Lévesque A
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S59-68. PubMed ID: 27145934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hearing impairment, cognition and speech understanding: exploratory factor analyses of a comprehensive test battery for a group of hearing aid users, the n200 study.
    Rönnberg J; Lunner T; Ng EH; Lidestam B; Zekveld AA; Sörqvist P; Lyxell B; Träff U; Yumba W; Classon E; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Signoret C; Pichora-Fuller MK; Rudner M; Danielsson H; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):623-42. PubMed ID: 27589015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The factors associated with a self-perceived hearing handicap in elderly people with hearing impairment--results from a community-based study.
    Chang HP; Ho CY; Chou P
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):576-83. PubMed ID: 19633566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Placebo effects in hearing-aid trials are reliable.
    Dawes P; Hopkins R; Munro KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jul; 52(7):472-7. PubMed ID: 23594421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Qualitative interviews on the beliefs and feelings of adults towards their ownership, but non-use of hearing aids.
    Linssen AM; Joore MA; Minten RK; van Leeuwen YD; Anteunis LJ
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Oct; 52(10):670-7. PubMed ID: 23829584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Decision-making and outcomes of hearing help-seekers: A self-determination theory perspective.
    Ridgway J; Hickson L; Lind C
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Jul; 55 Suppl 3():S13-22. PubMed ID: 26750770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the Swedish Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly (Screening Version) and Evaluation of Its Effect in Hearing Aid Rehabilitation.
    Öberg M
    Trends Hear; 2016 Mar; 20():. PubMed ID: 27009755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Real-ear output measures of ear level fluency devices.
    Stuart A; Butler AK; Jones SM; Jones TA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Jun; 52(6):413-8. PubMed ID: 23458475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.