415 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23809021)
1. Comparison of ProSeal LMA with Supreme LMA in paediatric patients.
Hoşten T; Gürkan Y; Kuş A; Özdamar D; Aksu C; Solak M; Toker K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2013 Sep; 57(8):996-1001. PubMed ID: 23809021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new supraglottic airway device: LMA-supreme, comparison with LMA-Proseal.
Hosten T; Gurkan Y; Ozdamar D; Tekin M; Toker K; Solak M
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2009 Aug; 53(7):852-7. PubMed ID: 19426239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised comparison of the LMA SupremeTM and LMAProSealTM in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Gordon J; Langen KE; Anderson K
Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):632-9. PubMed ID: 22420717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomised comparison of the self-pressurised air-QTM intubating laryngeal airway with the LMA Unique™ in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Shah R; Ryan K; Jagannathan R; Anderson K
Anaesthesia; 2012 Sep; 67(9):973-9. PubMed ID: 22670827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The LMA-Supreme versus the I-gel in simulated difficult airway in children: a randomised study.
Kus A; Gok CN; Hosten T; Gurkan Y; Solak M; Toker K
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2014 May; 31(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 24632572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children.
Jagannathan N; Sommers K; Sohn LE; Sawardekar A; Shah RD; Mukherji II; Miller S; Voronov P; Seraphin S
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Feb; 23(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 23189931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective clinical and fiberoptic evaluation of the Supreme laryngeal mask airway.
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Eich C; Kazmaier S; Bräuer A; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anesthesiology; 2009 Feb; 110(2):262-5. PubMed ID: 19194153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Supreme and the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
Anand LK; Goel N; Singh M; Kapoor D
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2016 Jun; 54(2):44-50. PubMed ID: 27106162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Fullekrug B; Agrò F; Rosenblatt W; Dierdorf SF; Garcia de Lucas E; Capdevilla X; Brimacombe N
Anesthesiology; 2002 Feb; 96(2):289-95. PubMed ID: 11818758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Safety and efficacy of laryngeal mask airway Supreme versus laryngeal mask airway ProSeal: a randomized controlled trial.
Seet E; Rajeev S; Firoz T; Yousaf F; Wong J; Wong DT; Chung F
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jul; 27(7):602-7. PubMed ID: 20540172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fiber-optic assessment of LMA position in children: a randomized crossover comparison of two techniques.
Ghai B; Ram J; Makkar JK; Wig J
Paediatr Anaesth; 2011 Nov; 21(11):1142-7. PubMed ID: 21689206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the Supreme™ and ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airways in infants: a prospective randomised clinical study.
Oba S; Turk HS; Isil CT; Erdogan H; Sayin P; Dokucu AI
BMC Anesthesiol; 2017 Sep; 17(1):125. PubMed ID: 28870163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Similar oropharyngeal leak pressures during anaesthesia with i-gel, LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Supreme Laryngeal Masks.
Van Zundert TC; Brimacombe JR
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2012; 63(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 22783708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized crossover comparison between the Laryngeal Mask Airway-Unique™ and the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway in children.
Jagannathan N; Sohn LE; Mankoo R; Langen KE; Mandler T
Paediatr Anaesth; 2012 Feb; 22(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 21917058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The applicability of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway for laparotomies].
Borkowski A; Perl T; Heuer J; Timmermann A; Braun U
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2005 Aug; 40(8):477-86. PubMed ID: 16078158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of the efficacy of different types of laryngeal mask airways in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery].
Shi YB; Zuo MZ; Du XH; Yu Z
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Jul; 93(25):1978-80. PubMed ID: 24169248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Laryngeal mask LMA Supreme. Application by medical personnel inexperienced in airway management].
Timmermann A; Cremer S; Heuer J; Braun U; Graf BM; Russo SG
Anaesthesist; 2008 Oct; 57(10):970-5. PubMed ID: 18712321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the LMA-ProSeal and LMA-Classic in children.
Shimbori H; Ono K; Miwa T; Morimura N; Noguchi M; Hiroki K
Br J Anaesth; 2004 Oct; 93(4):528-31. PubMed ID: 15298876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
