These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23809682)
1. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: where next? Macintosh M; McKee M Public Health; 2013 Jul; 127(7):681-3. PubMed ID: 23809682 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Implementing a Chlamydia pilot screening programme. Gleave T Nurs Times; 2002 Dec 10-16; 98(50):34-7. PubMed ID: 12518550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National chlamydia screening programme in England: making progress. Fenton KA; Ward H Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):331-3. PubMed ID: 15459397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Establishing the National Chlamydia Screening Programme in England: results from the first full year of screening. LaMontagne DS; Fenton KA; Randall S; Anderson S; Carter P Sex Transm Infect; 2004 Oct; 80(5):335-41. PubMed ID: 15459399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008. Simms I; Talebi A; Rhia J; Horner P; French RS; Sarah R; Macintosh M Sex Transm Dis; 2009 Aug; 36(8):522-7. PubMed ID: 19455079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Testing target. Sadler C Nurs Stand; 2010 Mar 31-Apr 6; 24(30):22-3. PubMed ID: 20425951 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chlamydia screening: making a case for including men. Holland D Nurs Times; 2006 Mar 28-Apr 3; 102(13):44-6. PubMed ID: 16605152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Chlamydia trachomatis: opportunistic screening in primary care. Santer M; Wyke S Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Nov; 51(472):931. PubMed ID: 11761212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. University undergraduates' knowledge of chlamydia screening services and chlamydia infection following the introduction of a National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Greaves A; Lonsdale S; Whinney S; Hood E; Mossop H; Olowokure B Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2009 Feb; 14(1):61-8. PubMed ID: 19241303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A third of trusts in England are still not offering screening for chlamydia. Laurent C BMJ; 2007 Sep; 335(7620):585. PubMed ID: 17884886 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The Dutch Health Council report on screening for Chlamydia: too reserved]. Dekker JH Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2005 Apr; 149(16):850-2. PubMed ID: 15868986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. With appropriate incentives, general practice can improve the coverage of the National Chlamydia Screening Programme. Ma R Br J Gen Pract; 2006 Nov; 56(532):892-3. PubMed ID: 17132369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening university students for genital chlamydial infection: another lesson to learn. Aldeen T; Jacobs J; Powell R Sex Health; 2010 Dec; 7(4):491-4. PubMed ID: 21062592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An observational study to evaluate three pilot programmes of retesting chlamydia-positive individuals within 6 months in the South West of England. Angel G; Horner PJ; O'Brien N; Sharp M; Pye K; Priestley C; Macleod J; Looker KJ; Turner KM BMJ Open; 2015 Oct; 5(10):e007455. PubMed ID: 26510723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Where do young Irish women want Chlamydia-screening services to be set up? A qualitative study employing Goffman's impression management framework. Balfe M; Brugha R; O' Connell E; McGee H; O' Donovan D Health Place; 2010 Jan; 16(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 19744875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]