419 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23810515)
1. Evaluation of bone regenerative capacity following distraction osteogenesis of goat mandibles using two different bone cutting techniques.
Nooh N; Abdullah WA; El-Awady Grawish M; Ramalingam S; Hassan G; Javed F; Al-Hezaimi K
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 42(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23810515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How does the rate of dentoalveolar distraction affect the bone regenerate produced?
Spencer AC; Campbell PM; Dechow P; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e211-21. PubMed ID: 22051499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of vertical body osteotomy and sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular corpus distraction.
Sahoo NK; Rangarajan H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Feb; 69(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 21111521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of latency on the quality and quantity of bone produced by dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis.
Moore C; Campbell PM; Dechow PC; Ellis ML; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):470-8. PubMed ID: 21967933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Local injection of substance P increases bony formation during mandibular distraction osteogenesis in rats.
Zhang YB; Wang L; Jia S; Du ZJ; Zhao YH; Liu YP; Lei DL
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 52(8):697-702. PubMed ID: 25069690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary study of the use of a shape-memory alloy distraction device in the dog mandible for alveolar ridge distraction: determination of osteotomy techniques and evaluation of osteogenesis outcome.
Xie M; Xiao H; Hu M; Liu H; Li Y
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 70(12):2876-83. PubMed ID: 22632929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osteodistraction of mandibles with a small bone defect at the planned osteotomy site: a histological pilot study in dogs.
Zandi M; Dehghan A; Saleh M; Seyed Hoseini SR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 42(5):e204-9. PubMed ID: 24113296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Expression of bone morphogenetic protein, vascular endothelial growth factor, and basic fibroblast growth factor in irradiated mandibles during distraction osteogenesis.
Zhang WB; Zheng LW; Chua DT; Cheung LK
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 69(11):2860-71. PubMed ID: 21741143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quantitative expression of bone-related cytokines induced by mechanical tension-stress during distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit mandible.
Nuntanaranont T; Suttapreyasri S; Vongvatcharanon S
J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):255-65. PubMed ID: 25288509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Navigation-assisted mandibular body distraction osteogenesis: a preliminary study in goats.
Cai M; Shen G; Cheng AH; Lin Y; Yu D; Ye M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):168.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24331570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in mandibular distraction osteogenesis after corticotomy and osteotomy.
Hu J; Li J; Wang D; Buckley MJ; Agarwal S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2002 Apr; 31(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 12102418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preprosthetic vertical distraction osteogenesis of the mandible using an L-shaped osteotomy and titanium membranes for guided bone regeneration.
Klug CN; Millesi-Schobel GA; Millesi W; Watzinger F; Ewers R
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Nov; 59(11):1302-8; discussion 1309-10. PubMed ID: 11688032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of bone morphogenic protein-2-coated tri-calcium phosphate/hydroxyapatite on new bone formation in a rat model of femoral distraction osteogenesis.
Yang JH; Kim HJ; Kim SE; Yun YP; Bae JH; Kim SJ; Choi KH; Song HR
Cytotherapy; 2012 Mar; 14(3):315-26. PubMed ID: 22122301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Possible problems of moulding the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis -- experimental aspects in a canine model.
Kunz C; Adolphs N; Buescher P; Hammer B; Rahn B
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2005 Dec; 33(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 16253512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experimental evaluation of acute molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction osteogenesis in a rabbit model.
Candırlı C; Dolanmaz D; Etöz OA; Avunduk MC
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Nov; 110(5):554-9. PubMed ID: 20576452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correction of rabbit model with mandibular ramus shortening by distraction osteogenesis at condylar neck.
Meng Q; Yang X; Long X; Li J; Cai H
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):931-40. PubMed ID: 21764198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. bFGF-Modified BMMSCs enhance bone regeneration following distraction osteogenesis in rabbits.
Jiang X; Zou S; Ye B; Zhu S; Liu Y; Hu J
Bone; 2010 Apr; 46(4):1156-61. PubMed ID: 20036345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new method to improve defects of the mandibular angle using an asymmetrical bone distraction technique.
Muñoz-Guerra MF; Rodríguez-Campo FJ; Rosón-Gómez S; Naval-Gías L
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):925-30. PubMed ID: 21764495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Percutaneous CO2 Treatment Accelerates Bone Generation During Distraction Osteogenesis in Rabbits.
Kumabe Y; Fukui T; Takahara S; Kuroiwa Y; Arakura M; Oe K; Oda T; Sawauchi K; Matsushita T; Matsumoto T; Hayashi S; Kuroda R; Niikura T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1922-1935. PubMed ID: 32732577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandibular distraction osteogenesis with newly designed electromechanical distractor.
Aykan A; Ugurlutan R; Zor F; Ozturk S
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Jul; 25(4):1519-23. PubMed ID: 24914755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
