These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. US Supreme Court hears arguments in case of BRCA1 and BRCA2 [corrected] patents. McCarthy M BMJ; 2013 Apr; 346():f2446. PubMed ID: 23596230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Patenting genes: what does Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics mean for genetic testing and research? Cartwright-Smith L Public Health Rep; 2014 May; 129(3):289-92. PubMed ID: 24790252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. US Supreme Court is asked to rule on validity of patents on BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Oct; 345():e6624. PubMed ID: 23033368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. BRCA patent dispute may head to US Supreme Court. Devi S Lancet; 2012 Jan; 379(9813):300. PubMed ID: 22292161 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Supreme Court will rule on whether patents for BRAC1 and BRAC2 genes are valid. Dyer C BMJ; 2012 Dec; 345():e8266. PubMed ID: 23223689 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Data disclosure crucial after DNA patent verdict. de Costa A Science; 2013 Aug; 341(6149):959. PubMed ID: 23990544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. US Supreme Court rules on landmark gene patent case. Sklan A Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Sep; 2(5):581. PubMed ID: 24237164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Patent law. Law and science collide over human gene patents. Cook-Deegan R Science; 2012 Nov; 338(6108):745-7. PubMed ID: 23139317 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [The Supreme Court free genes - economic and legal justifications - impacts on innovation and the healthcare offer]. Cassier M; Stoppa-Lyonnet D Med Sci (Paris); 2015 Feb; 31(2):209-13. PubMed ID: 25744269 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Supremes got it right. Somberg J Am J Ther; 2013; 20(4):315. PubMed ID: 23838630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Federal Circuit's decision in Myriad: isolated DNA molecules are patentable subject matter. Ogden SR Am Univ Law Rev; 2011; 61(2):443-56. PubMed ID: 25335196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intellectual property. In a flurry of metaphors, justices debate a limit on gene patents. Marshall E Science; 2013 Apr; 340(6131):421. PubMed ID: 23620028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court's invalidation of gene patents a boon for care. Am J Med Genet A; 2010 Jun; 152A(6):fmix. PubMed ID: 20503301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Who owns human genes?: Is DNA patentable? Gostin LO JAMA; 2013 Aug; 310(8):791-2. PubMed ID: 23877839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Not quite a myriad of gene patents. Graff GD; Phillips D; Lei Z; Oh S; Nottenburg C; Pardey PG Nat Biotechnol; 2013 May; 31(5):404-10. PubMed ID: 23657391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]