These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23811410)

  • 1. Canonical Granger causality between regions of interest.
    Ashrafulla S; Haldar JP; Joshi AA; Leahy RM
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():189-99. PubMed ID: 23811410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Noninvasive Electromagnetic Source Imaging and Granger Causality Analysis: An Electrophysiological Connectome (eConnectome) Approach.
    Sohrabpour A; Ye S; Worrell GA; Zhang W; He B
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2016 Dec; 63(12):2474-2487. PubMed ID: 27740473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Nonlinear effective connectivity measure based on adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System and Granger Causality.
    Farokhzadi M; Hossein-Zadeh GA; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    Neuroimage; 2018 Nov; 181():382-394. PubMed ID: 30010006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring Granger causality between cortical regions from voxelwise fMRI BOLD signals with LASSO.
    Tang W; Bressler SL; Sylvester CM; Shulman GL; Corbetta M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2012; 8(5):e1002513. PubMed ID: 22654651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamic Granger causality based on Kalman filter for evaluation of functional network connectivity in fMRI data.
    Havlicek M; Jan J; Brazdil M; Calhoun VD
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 53(1):65-77. PubMed ID: 20561919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting multivariate cross-correlation between brain regions.
    Rodu J; Klein N; Brincat SL; Miller EK; Kass RE
    J Neurophysiol; 2018 Oct; 120(4):1962-1972. PubMed ID: 29947591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Statistical analysis of single-trial Granger causality spectra.
    Brovelli A
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():697610. PubMed ID: 22649482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spike-field Granger causality for hybrid neural data analysis.
    Gong X; Li W; Liang H
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Aug; 122(2):809-822. PubMed ID: 31242046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring directed functional connectivity using non-parametric directionality analysis: Validation and comparison with non-parametric Granger Causality.
    West TO; Halliday DM; Bressler SL; Farmer SF; Litvak V
    Neuroimage; 2020 Sep; 218():116796. PubMed ID: 32325209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of time-variant EEG Granger causality for inspecting directed interdependencies of neural assemblies.
    Hesse W; Möller E; Arnold M; Schack B
    J Neurosci Methods; 2003 Mar; 124(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 12648763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigating effective brain connectivity from fMRI data: past findings and current issues with reference to Granger causality analysis.
    Deshpande G; Hu X
    Brain Connect; 2012; 2(5):235-45. PubMed ID: 23016794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of effective connectivity in the brain using a measure of directed information.
    Liu Y; Aviyente S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2012; 2012():635103. PubMed ID: 22675401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Kernel canonical-correlation Granger causality for multiple time series.
    Wu G; Duan X; Liao W; Gao Q; Chen H
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2011 Apr; 83(4 Pt 1):041921. PubMed ID: 21599214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental Validation of Dynamic Granger Causality for Inferring Stimulus-Evoked Sub-100 ms Timing Differences from fMRI.
    Wang Y; Katwal S; Rogers B; Gore J; Deshpande G
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2017 Jun; 25(6):539-546. PubMed ID: 27448367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How to detect the Granger-causal flow direction in the presence of additive noise?
    Vinck M; Huurdeman L; Bosman CA; Fries P; Battaglia FP; Pennartz CM; Tiesinga PH
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():301-18. PubMed ID: 25514516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality.
    Dhamala M; Rangarajan G; Ding M
    Neuroimage; 2008 Jun; 41(2):354-62. PubMed ID: 18394927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Benchmarking nonparametric Granger causality: Robustness against downsampling and influence of spectral decomposition parameters.
    Pagnotta MF; Dhamala M; Plomp G
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():478-494. PubMed ID: 30036586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Granger causality between multiple interdependent neurobiological time series: blockwise versus pairwise methods.
    Wang X; Chen Y; Bressler SL; Ding M
    Int J Neural Syst; 2007 Apr; 17(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17565503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Granger causality and information flow in multivariate processes.
    Blinowska KJ; Kuś R; Kamiński M
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Nov; 70(5 Pt 1):050902. PubMed ID: 15600583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.