183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23811646)
1. Cephalometric assessment of effect of head rotation toward focal spot on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Naresh V; Lokesh NK; Pratapvarma KV; Srikrishna C; Chakravarthy VG; Shamnur N
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):202-7. PubMed ID: 23811646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of Image Distortion from Head Rotation in Lateral Cephalometry.
Gaddam R; Shashikumar HC; Lokesh NK; Suma T; Arya S; Shwetha GS
J Int Oral Health; 2015 Jun; 7(6):35-40. PubMed ID: 26124597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of head rotation on lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Yoon YJ; Kim KS; Hwang MS; Kim HJ; Choi EH; Kim KW
Angle Orthod; 2001 Oct; 71(5):396-403. PubMed ID: 11605875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of head rotation on cephalometric radiographs.
Malkoc S; Sari Z; Usumez S; Koyuturk AE
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 15947234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validity and reproducibility of cephalometric measurements obtained from digital photographs of analogue headfilms.
Grybauskas S; Balciuniene I; Vetra J
Stomatologija; 2007; 9(4):114-20. PubMed ID: 18303276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on lateral cephalograms obtained from cone-beam computed tomography scans with digital lateral cephalometric radiography: an in vitro study.
Shokri A; Khajeh S; Khavid A
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 25(5):1710-3. PubMed ID: 25203572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of head rotation on posteroanterior cephalometric radiographs.
Yoon YJ; Kim DH; Yu PS; Kim HJ; Choi EH; Kim KW
Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 11843271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the accuracy of linear measurements on spiral computed tomography-derived three-dimensional images and its comparison with digital cephalometric radiography.
Varghese S; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Vikraman B; Chithranjan A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2010 May; 39(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 20395462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of landmark identification and linear and angular measurements in conventional and digital cephalometry.
Akhare PJ; Dagab AM; Alle RS; Shenoyd U; Garla V
Int J Comput Dent; 2013; 16(3):241-54. PubMed ID: 24364195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of inter- and intra-operator cephalometric tracings on cone beam CT radiographs: comparison of the precision of the cone beam CT versus the latero-lateral radiograph tracing.
Farronato G; Salvadori S; Nolet F; Zoia A; Farronato D
Prog Orthod; 2014 Jan; 15():1. PubMed ID: 24393493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combined effects of errors in frontal-view asymmetry diagnosis.
Pirttiniemi P; Miettinen J; Kantomaa T
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):629-36. PubMed ID: 9009427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of head orientation on posterior anterior cephalometric landmark identification.
Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 8678346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between two-dimensional and midsagittal three-dimensional cephalometric measurements of dry human skulls.
Damstra J; Fourie Z; Ren Y
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 49(5):392-5. PubMed ID: 20615593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurements from conventional, digital and CT-derived cephalograms: a comparative study.
Ghoneima A; Albarakati S; Baysal A; Uysal T; Kula K
Aust Orthod J; 2012 Nov; 28(2):232-9. PubMed ID: 23304973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Panoramic radiography: effects of head alignment on the vertical dimension of the mandibular ramus and condyle region.
Sadat-Khonsari R; Fenske C; Behfar L; Bauss O
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 21467122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lateral cephalometric diagnosis of asymmetry in Angle Class II subdivision compared to Class I and II.
Meloti AF; Gonçalves Rde C; Silva E; Martins LP; dos Santos-Pinto A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(4):80-8. PubMed ID: 25279525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is it possible to use cross-sectional and vertical facial measurements to establish the shape of the mandibular arch?
El Haje OA; Pompeo DD; Furtado GC; Rivera LM; Paranhos LR
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):735-9. PubMed ID: 25825099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
