234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23811648)
1. Evaluation of efficacy of different gingival displacement materials on gingival sulcus width.
Prasanna GS; Reddy K; Kumar RK; Shivaprakash S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):217-21. PubMed ID: 23811648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A clinical comparison of cordless and conventional displacement systems regarding clinical performance and impression quality.
Acar Ö; Erkut S; Özçelik TB; Ozdemır E; Akçil M
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):388-94. PubMed ID: 24360008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement materials.
Bennani V; Inger M; Aarts JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):163-7. PubMed ID: 24529659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of Different Gingival Displacement Materials in the Management of Gingival Sulcus Width: A Comparative Study.
Rathod A; Jacob SS; MAlqahtani A; Valsan I; Majeed R; Premnath A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Jun; 22(6):703-706. PubMed ID: 34393130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical efficacy of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials using the one-step two-viscosity impression technique.
Dogan S; Schwedhelm ER; Heindl H; Mancl L; Raigrodski AJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):217-22. PubMed ID: 25976708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A multicenter randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords, an aluminum chloride paste, and a combination of paste and cords for tissue displacement.
Einarsdottir ER; Lang NP; Aspelund T; Pjetursson BE
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jan; 119(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28478985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Polymerization time compatibility index of polyvinyl siloxane impression materials with conventional and experimental gingival margin displacement agents.
Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 24461950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of gingival displacement cord and cordless systems on the closure, displacement, and inflammation of the gingival crevice.
Chandra S; Singh A; Gupta KK; Chandra C; Arora V
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 26443067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Inhibition of polymerization of polyvinyl siloxanes by medicaments used on gingival retraction cords.
de Camargo LM; Chee WW; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Aug; 70(2):114-7. PubMed ID: 8371173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nonsurgical gingival displacement in restorative dentistry.
Thomas MS; Joseph RM; Parolia A
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2011 Jun; 32(5):26-34; quiz 36, 38. PubMed ID: 21755893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing the use of displacement cords and aluminum chloride paste.
Bennani V; Aarts JM; Brunton P
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Jun; 32(4):410-415. PubMed ID: 32442353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation of pressure and displacement during gingival displacement: An in vitro study.
Bennani V; Aarts JM; Schumayer D
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 26548889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical Assessment of Gingival Sulcus Width using Various Gingival Displacement Materials.
Goutham GB; Jayanti I; Jalaluddin M; Avijeeta A; Ramanna PK; Joy J
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 May; 19(5):502-506. PubMed ID: 29807958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
Batson ER; Cooper LF; Duqum I; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Preimpression troughing with the diode laser: A preliminary study.
Stuffken M; Vahidi F
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Apr; 115(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 26723098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of pre-soaked retraction cords on the microcirculation of the human gingival margin.
Fazekas A; Csempesz F; Csabai Z; Vág J
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 12120770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local and systemic effects of mechanico-chemical retraction.
Donaldson M; Goodchild JH
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Sep; 34 Spec No 6():1-7; quiz p8. PubMed ID: 24350912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gingival displacement: Survey results of dentists' practice procedures.
Ahmed SN; Donovan TE
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):81-5.e1-2. PubMed ID: 25917854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New Zealand dentists' use of gingival retraction techniques for fixed prosthodontics and implants.
Al-Ani A; Bennani V; Chandler NP; Lyons KM; Thomson WM
N Z Dent J; 2010 Sep; 106(3):92-6. PubMed ID: 20882737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
