These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23811648)

  • 41. Evaluation of Gingival Displacement with Aluminum Chloride and Naphazoline Hydrochloride: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    de Carvalho WF; Junior LCV; Junior HFB; Suguiura TPDS; Previdelli ITS; Sábio S
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Feb; 29(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 33026719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative Evaluation of the Amount of Gingival Displacement Using Three Recent Gingival Retraction Systems -
    Qureshi SM; Anasane NS; Kakade D
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2020; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 33110305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The use of retraction paste to simplify impression and cementation of ceramic veneers and crowns: 3-year follow-up report.
    Andreiuolo RF; Abreu JLB; Hirata R
    Quintessence Int; 2019; 50(8):604-610. PubMed ID: 31286117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A comparison of pressure generated by cordless gingival displacement techniques.
    Bennani V; Aarts JM; He LH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):388-92. PubMed ID: 22633595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Gingival retraction.
    Carville R
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015 Dec; 61(6):298-300. PubMed ID: 26902073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Gingival displacement using diode laser or retraction cords: A comparative clinical study.
    Melilli D; Mauceri R; Albanese A; Matranga D; Pizzo G
    Am J Dent; 2018 Jun; 31(3):131-134. PubMed ID: 30028930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Current concepts in gingival displacement.
    Donovan TE; Chee WW
    Dent Clin North Am; 2004 Apr; 48(2):vi, 433-44. PubMed ID: 15172609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparative evaluation of three gingival displacement materials for efficacy in tissue management and dimensional accuracy.
    Gajbhiye V; Banerjee R; Jaiswal P; Chandak A; Radke U
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2019; 19(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 31040552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A Clinical Study of 50 Partially Edentulous Patients with Fixed Partial Denture Restorations to Compare Clinical Parameters and Changes in Gingival Sulcus Width After Displacement with 2 Different Gingival Retraction Cord Materials (Cotton and Polymer).
    Kumar L; Mattoo KA; Jain S; Khalid I; Kota MZ; Baig FAH; Ibrahim M; Javali MA; Khader MA; Kanji MA
    Med Sci Monit; 2023 Apr; 29():e940098. PubMed ID: 37183802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of a cordless retraction paste on titanium surface: a topographic, chemical and biocompatibility evaluation.
    Cooper K; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Reid M; Stirling C; Dias G
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):211-7. PubMed ID: 23739788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The Setting Time of Polyether Impression Materials after Contact with Conventional and Experimental Gingival Margin Displacement Agents.
    Nowakowska D; Raszewski Z; Ziętek M; Saczko J; Kulbacka J; Więckiewicz W
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):182-188. PubMed ID: 27333590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions.
    Anadioti E; Aquilino SA; Gratton DG; Holloway JA; Denry I; Thomas GW; Qian F
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Dec; 23(8):610-7. PubMed ID: 24995593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Efficiency of Cordless Versus Cord Techniques of Gingival Retraction: A Systematic Review.
    Huang C; Somar M; Li K; Mohadeb JVN
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Apr; 26(3):177-185. PubMed ID: 26378615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Sulcus depth reproduction with polyvinyl siloxane impression material: effects of hydrophilicity and impression temperature.
    Takahashi H; Finger WJ; Kurokawa R; Furukawa M; Komatsu M
    Quintessence Int; 2010 Mar; 41(3):e43-50. PubMed ID: 20213014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The effect of marginal thickness on the distortion of different impression materials.
    Laufer BZ; Baharav H; Ganor Y; Cardash HS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Nov; 76(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 8933434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Impact of digital impression techniques on the adaption of ceramic partial crowns in vitro.
    Schaefer O; Decker M; Wittstock F; Kuepper H; Guentsch A
    J Dent; 2014 Jun; 42(6):677-83. PubMed ID: 24508541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Marginal and internal fit of metal-ceramic crowns fabricated with a new laser melting technology.
    Quante K; Ludwig K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1311-5. PubMed ID: 18384869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A predictable gingival retraction system.
    Pescatore C
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2002 Jan; 23(1 Suppl):7-12; quiz 18. PubMed ID: 11913273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Effect of a cordless retraction paste material on implant surfaces: an in vitro study.
    Chang YS; Bennani V; Tawse-Smith A; Girvan L
    Braz Oral Res; 2011; 25(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 22147228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparative study on gingival retraction using mechanochemical procedure and pulsed Nd = YAG laser irradiation.
    Abdel Gabbar F; Aboulazm SF
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Jan; 41(1):1001-6. PubMed ID: 9497632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.