These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23811666)

  • 1. Influence of artificial aging in marginal adaptation of mixed class V cavities.
    Tonetto MR; Bandéca MC; Barud HG; Pinto SC; Lima DM; Borges AH; de Campos EA; de Andrade MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Mar; 14(2):316-9. PubMed ID: 23811666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal adaptation of class V restorations with current-generation dentin-bonding agents: effect of different dentin surface treatments.
    Cavalheiro JP; Tonetto MR; Borges ÁH; Bandéca MC; dos Santos RS; de Campos EA; Saad JR; Dantas AA; de Andrade MF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):331-5. PubMed ID: 25307816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selective enamel etching: effect on marginal adaptation of self-etch LED-cured bond systems in aged Class I composite restorations.
    Souza-Junior EJ; Prieto LT; Araújo CT; Paulillo LA
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 22313271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of curing unit and adhesive system on marginal adaptation of composite restorations.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(6):e408-12. PubMed ID: 23220321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging.
    Manhart J; Trumm C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Dec; 14(6):699-705. PubMed ID: 19937075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effectiveness of an infiltrant on sealing of composite restoration margins with/without artificial caries.
    Tulunoglu O; Tulunoglu IF; Antonson SA; Campillo-Funollet M; Antonson D; Munoz-Viveros C
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Nov; 15(6):717-25. PubMed ID: 25825096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of Cavity Margin Design and Restorative Material on Marginal Quality and Seal of Extended Class II Resin Composite Restorations In Vitro.
    Soliman S; Preidl R; Karl S; Hofmann N; Krastl G; Klaiber B
    J Adhes Dent; 2016; 18(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 26814320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marginal adaptation of indirect restorations using different resin coating protocols.
    Medina AD; de Paula AB; de Fucio SB; Puppin-Rontani RM; Correr-Sobrinho L; Sinhoreti MA
    Braz Dent J; 2012; 23(6):672-8. PubMed ID: 23338259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of curing methods and matrix type on the marginal seal of class II resin-based composite restorations in vitro.
    Hofmann N; Hunecke A
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 16536200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of class V composite restorations submitted to thermal and mechanical cycling.
    Casselli DS; Faria-e-Silva AL; Casselli H; Martins LR
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2013; 21(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 23559115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in-vitro study of microleakage around class V cavities bonded with a self-etching material versus a conventional two-bottle system.
    Salim S; Santini A; Husham A
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Jul; 13(3):107-11. PubMed ID: 16836814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of Class V restorations using different restorative techniques.
    Krejci I; Lutz F
    J Dent; 1991 Feb; 19(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 1901872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal integrity of large compomer Class II restorations with cervical margins in dentine.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Roulet J
    J Dent; 2000 Aug; 28(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 10856804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Flowable materials as an intermediate layer could improve the marginal and internal adaptation of composite restorations in Class-V-cavities.
    Li Q; Jepsen S; Albers HK; Eberhard J
    Dent Mater; 2006 Mar; 22(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 16084584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different surface pre-treatment methods on the microleakage of two different self-adhesive composites in Class V cavities.
    Celik EU; Kucukyilmaz E; Savas S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25793951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of incorrect application of a water-based adhesive system on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Peschke A; Blunck U; Roulet JF
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):239-44. PubMed ID: 11764109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.